[Users] drop() and final replies
bogdan at voice-system.ro
Fri Jul 14 13:33:16 CEST 2006
not sure about this. If you do serial forking, the reply selected to be
sent back to the UAC is only from the last serial step.
So if you have a first serial step ended with 302 and a second one ended
with 486, the 486 (if no other code is forced from script) will be sent
to the UAC.
hopefully I got your scenario correctly - if it doesn't work like this,
please let me know.
Andreas Granig wrote:
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>> for re-writing the negative final replies, use the failure route:
> Oh, yes, of course. But, however, it seems to be a little bit more
> There are clients with adjustable ring-timeouts, which signal 302 and
> a Contact to refer to on such a timeout event. I intercept such
> replies and perform a server-side call-forward.
> Now if the UAC the call is forwarded to is busy and replies with 486,
> I can intercept this reply, but if I call break (for example because
> there is no conditional call-forward for this busy UAC), the first 302
> is handed back to the original caller, and I don't see a way how to
> catch this reply again and rewrite it.
> Any ideas?
More information about the sr-users