[Serusers] SER & SEMS on separate machines

[sip]

SER and SEMS of SOME sort must be on the same machine, but it doesn't have to
be your main SER. I have a copy of SER running on a separate machine with SEMS
that is pared down considerable and does nothing but handle SEMS stuff... the
main SER server forwards calls onto the SER/SEMS server (on a different
machine) for the sake of performance. 

You DO have to have a copy of at least the subscriber table (or, really, only
PARTS of the subscriber table) for the voicemail app to work as it grabs the
email address. 

Your choices are to either have a DB url that points to the original DB or
replicate your subscriber info to two different tables. 

We chose the latter. On creation of a user account, we have a trigger that
replicates the subscriber info to a separate DB on the SER/SEMS machine.
During testing, however, we had it originally set up to just point to the
original DB and noticed no real performance hit. 

N.

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:00:08 +0100, samuel wrote
> I think SER and SEMS must be on the same machine becasue they use 
> FIFO or UNIX socket to interact.
> 
> Sam.
> 2006/1/27, Amos M. Nungu <amos.nungu at gmail.com>:
> > Hello members,
> >
> > I have SER and SEMS on the same machine and it works fine. For
> > performance reasons, I would like to them to be on separate machines.
> >
> > My query is the fact that SEMS uses the email address from the
> > subscriber table in SER db. Do I need to have SER db on the machine
> > where SEMS is running (means 2 identical dbs) or how can I achieve this?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amos.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers