[Sems] Re: [Serusers] SER & SEMS on separate machines

[Voipers Portugal]

Hi,

IMO, what Jiri wanted to say is that, when you get a an INVITE that is
supposed to be redirected to SEMS, you should add the e-mail address to the
Invite SIP message, so that the SEMS machine does not need to search for the
e-mail address in another machine.

Jose Simoes


On 2/2/06, Amos Nungu <amos.nungu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jiri,
>
> I didn't get it cleary what you mean. I would like to try it if you can
> explain a bit more.
>
> NB.
> Thanks for everyone. I used the method advised by "sip" and works
> perfect (SER 0.9.3, SEMS 0.9.0).
>
> Regards.
>
> Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>
> >you may also try to put the email address in the forwarded request at
> proxy and restore it from there at SER/SEMS box. This saves a DB lookup.
> -jiri
> >
> >At 12:58 PM 1/27/2006, sip wrote:
> >
> >
> >>SER and SEMS of SOME sort must be on the same machine, but it doesn't
> have to
> >>be your main SER. I have a copy of SER running on a separate machine
> with SEMS
> >>that is pared down considerable and does nothing but handle SEMS
> stuff... the
> >>main SER server forwards calls onto the SER/SEMS server (on a different
> >>machine) for the sake of performance.
> >>
> >>You DO have to have a copy of at least the subscriber table (or, really,
> only
> >>PARTS of the subscriber table) for the voicemail app to work as it grabs
> the
> >>email address.
> >>
> >>Your choices are to either have a DB url that points to the original DB
> or
> >>replicate your subscriber info to two different tables.
> >>
> >>We chose the latter. On creation of a user account, we have a trigger
> that
> >>replicates the subscriber info to a separate DB on the SER/SEMS machine.
> >>During testing, however, we had it originally set up to just point to
> the
> >>original DB and noticed no real performance hit.
> >>
> >>N.
> >>
> >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:00:08 +0100, samuel wrote
> >>
> >>
> >>>I think SER and SEMS must be on the same machine becasue they use
> >>>FIFO or UNIX socket to interact.
> >>>
> >>>Sam.
> >>>2006/1/27, Amos M. Nungu <amos.nungu at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hello members,
> >>>>
> >>>>I have SER and SEMS on the same machine and it works fine. For
> >>>>performance reasons, I would like to them to be on separate machines.
> >>>>
> >>>>My query is the fact that SEMS uses the email address from the
> >>>>subscriber table in SER db. Do I need to have SER db on the machine
> >>>>where SEMS is running (means 2 identical dbs) or how can I achieve
> this?
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards,
> >>>>Amos.
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Serusers mailing list
> >>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Serusers mailing list
> >>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Serusers mailing list
> >>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sems mailing list
> sems at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sems
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060202/0103a064/attachment.htm>