[Users] Re: [Devel] preparation of patch release 1.0.1

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Fri Feb 3 15:48:05 CET 2006


Greg Fausak wrote:
> Klaus,
> 
> Postgres uses single quotes for strings, and double quotes for "names",
> so, you could do:
> 
> select "condition", "uri" from "table" where "domain" = 'test.com';
> 

OK. Thanks.

regards
klaus

> -g
> 
> On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:59 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
>> Hi Dan!
>>
>> Do you know if this is also an issue in postgres and if backticks  works
>> also in postgres?
>>
>> regards
>> klaus
>>
>> On Fri, February 3, 2006 13:11, Dan Pascu said:
>>
>>>
>>> A thing that would need fixing is how the mysql queries are  generated.
>>> To avoid issues, the field names in queries should be surrounded by
>>> backticks. This is to avoid a query being invalid because a field  name
>>> that is used matches a mysql keyword.
>>>
>>> I have recently experienced this with mysql 5.0 where a number of new
>>> keywords were introduced. I have a table that has a field named
>>> 'condition'. In mysql 5.0 I can no longer select this by using a  query
>>> like:
>>>
>>> select condition, uri from table where domain = 'test.com';
>>>
>>> instead a query like this works:
>>>
>>> select `condition`, `uri` from table where `domain` = 'test.com'
>>>
>>> The idea is to surround all the field names in the query in  backticks,
>>> wherever they appear, to avoid any future issues if some fieldname  that
>>> openser uses will suddenly become a keyword in the next version of  
>>> mysql.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday 03 February 2006 13:23, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>
>>>> a new package building of CVS branch rel_1_0_0 (release v1.0.0) will
>>>> take place soon. This comes as an update to release 1.0.0 which will
>>>> include the fixings occurred since 1.0.0 was released.
>>>>
>>>> We like to collect all issues of v1.0.0 you are aware of, to be  fixed
>>>> before package generation. Next is a list of the issues that  should be
>>>> fixed:
>>>> - TLS - when TLS connections is refused, immediate reply instead of
>>>> waiting for timeout
>>>> - TCP - when the call is initiated over TCP but the contact  advertised
>>>> is UDP, the BYE from callee is not routed properly (it is tried  TCP 
>>>> due
>>>> to double RR)
>>>> - record_route_preset() parameter size
>>>> - ruri matching of canceled transactions (see:
>>>> http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-February/002951.html)
>>>>
>>>> Any feedback is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>> Devel at openser.org
>>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel at openser.org
>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 





More information about the sr-users mailing list