Re: Re: [Serusers] unwanted ACK forward
tzieleniewski
tzieleniewski at o2.pl
Thu Dec 21 11:14:33 CET 2006
Thanku for fast unswer!
Sorry but I made copy/paste error:)
here is the correct grep:
#
U 2006/12/19 13:59:52.296438 192.168.0.138:5060 -> 192.168.0.74:5060
INVITE sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6353-1-0;rport.
Route: <sip:scscf.ims.touk.pl;lr>.
Max-Forwards: 70.
Contact: <sip:sippclient at 192.168.0.138:5061>.
To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>.
From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
Call-ID: 1-6353 at 192.168.0.138.
CSeq: 1 INVITE.
Subject: Performance Test.
Content-Type: application/sdp.
Content-Length: 137.
.
v=0.
o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 192.168.0.138.
s=-.
t=0 0.
c=IN IP4 192.168.0.138.
m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0.
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000.
.
#
U 2006/12/19 13:59:52.296960 192.168.0.74:5060 -> 192.168.0.138:5060
SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6353-1-0;rport=5060.
To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=9463a2e9cf4445c72e97ac31aeb7f1ed.4ea0.
From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
Call-ID: 1-6353 at 192.168.0.138.
CSeq: 1 INVITE.
Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="scscf.ims.touk.pl", nonce="4587f18458a218340aa80d3f0cb5a4886fc200be".
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.7-pre1 (x86_64/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 scscf.ims.touk.pl:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5452 req_src_ip=192.168.0.138 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl out_uri=sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl via_cnt==1".
.
#
U 2006/12/19 13:59:52.297775 192.168.0.138:5060 -> 192.168.0.74:5060
ACK sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6353-1-4;rport.
To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=9463a2e9cf4445c72e97ac31aeb7f1ed.4ea0.
From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
Contact: <sip:sippclient at 192.168.0.138:5061>.
Call-ID: 1-6353 at 192.168.0.138.
CSeq: 1 ACK.
Subject: Performance Test.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 2006/12/19 13:59:52.298207 192.168.0.74:5060 -> 192.168.0.138:7002
ACK sip:tzl at 192.168.0.138:7002 SIP/2.0.
Max-Forwards: 10.
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.0.74;ftag=1;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.74;branch=0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6353-1-4;rport=5060.
To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=9463a2e9cf4445c72e97ac31aeb7f1ed.4ea0.
From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
Contact: <sip:sippclient at 192.168.0.138:5061>.
Call-ID: 1-6353 at 192.168.0.138.
CSeq: 1 ACK.
Subject: Performance Test.
Content-Length: 0.
.
Bests
Tomasz Zieleniewski
> There's nothing wrong in your scenario and I don't see ser forwarding
> the ACK to the uas. I see the uas sending the same ACK to ser twice with
> exactly the same timestamp 13:29:24.986124. Are you sure you for some
> reason haven't captured the same packet twice?
> g-)
>
> tzieleniewski wrote:
> > Hi All!
> >
> > I was trying to write some test under sipp to test ser.
> > My scenario was the following:
> > UA1 SIPProxy UA2
> > |INVITE | |
> > |------------->| |
> > |407 | |
> > |<-------------| |
> > |ACK | |
> > |------------->| |
> > |INVITE | |
> > |------------->| |
> > |TRYING | |
> > |<-------------| |
> > | |INVITE |
> > | |------------->|
> > | |OK |
> > | |<-------------|
> > |OK | |
> > |<-------------| |
> > |ACK | |
> > |------------->| |
> > | |ACK |
> > | |------------->|
> > I have no idea why in case of sipp emulation ser forward the first ACK to the UAS wich is in my case x-lite under linux. ser ip is 192.168.0.74:)
> >
> > The ngrep from ser port is as follows:
> > #
> > U 2006/12/19 13:29:24.976872 192.168.0.138:5060 -> 192.168.0.74:5060
> > INVITE sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl SIP/2.0.
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6204-1-0;rport.
> > Route: <sip:scscf.ims.touk.pl;lr>.
> > Max-Forwards: 70.
> > Contact: <sip:sippclient at 192.168.0.138:5061>.
> > To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>.
> > From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
> > Call-ID: 1-6204 at 127.0.0.1.
> > CSeq: 1 INVITE.
> > Subject: Performance Test.
> > Content-Type: application/sdp.
> > Content-Length: 133.
> > .
> > v=0.
> > o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 192.168.0.138.
> > s=-.
> > t=0 0.
> > c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1.
> > m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0.
> > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000.
> >
> > #
> > U 2006/12/19 13:29:24.977525 192.168.0.74:5060 -> 192.168.0.138:5060
> > SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required.
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6204-1-0;rport=5060.
> > To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=9463a2e9cf4445c72e97ac31aeb7f1ed.a61b.
> > From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
> > Call-ID: 1-6204 at 127.0.0.1.
> > CSeq: 1 INVITE.
> > Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="scscf.ims.touk.pl", nonce="4587ea6059d5f141fce33748a3560a1eb274d934".
> > Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.7-pre1 (x86_64/linux)).
> > Content-Length: 0.
> > Warning: 392 scscf.ims.touk.pl:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5453 req_src_ip=192.168.0.138 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl out_uri=sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl via_cnt==1".
> > .
> >
> > #
> > U 2006/12/19 13:29:24.986124 192.168.0.138:5060 -> 192.168.0.74:5060
> > ACK sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl SIP/2.0.
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6204-1-4;rport.
> > To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=9463a2e9cf4445c72e97ac31aeb7f1ed.a61b.
> > From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
> > Call-ID: 1-6204 at 127.0.0.1.
> > CSeq: 1 ACK.
> > Subject: Performance Test.
> > Content-Length: 0.
> > .
> >
> > #
> > U 2006/12/19 13:29:24.986124 192.168.0.138:5060 -> 192.168.0.74:5060
> > ACK sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl SIP/2.0.
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.138:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-6204-1-4;rport.
> > To: "tzl"<sip:tzl at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=9463a2e9cf4445c72e97ac31aeb7f1ed.a61b.
> > From: "sippclient"<sip:sippclient at scscf.ims.touk.pl>;tag=1.
> > Call-ID: 1-6204 at 127.0.0.1.
> > CSeq: 1 ACK.
> > Subject: Performance Test.
> > Content-Length: 0.
> > .
> >
> > there is olso one thing more when I used x-lite instead of the sipp as uac ser did't forward the ACK.
> >
> > Please help me with this one.
> > Bests tomek
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
More information about the sr-users
mailing list