[Users] Duplicate INVITEs - t_lookup_request and t_check_trans
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at voice-system.ro
Thu Dec 14 19:39:04 CET 2006
Hi Mahesh,
I do not think you need t_check_tran() as t_relay() automatically
absorbs the retransmissions.
are you sure you are not calling t_relay() twice for the same requests?
or calling a tm function (t_newtran) before the t_relay ??
regards,
bogdan
Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote:
>Well, i read the documentation again, and found t_lookup_request, and t_check_trans.
>Question 1 - t_lookup_request() creates the transaction if it doesn't exist, correct? However, t_check_trans only checks to see if the transaction already exists, correct?
>
>Question 2 - Assuming that t_check_trans only checks to see if the transaction already exists, then is the following correct?
>
>Currently I do the following (after stripping out a bunch of stuff)
>
>if (!t_relay()) {
> if (!is_method("ACK")) {
> sl_reply_error();
> }
>}
>
>should this, instead, actually look like the following?
>if (is_method("INVITE")) {
> if (if !t_check_tran()) {
> t_relay();
> }
>} else if (!is_method("ACK")) {
> sl_reply_error();
>}
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>
>To: mahesh at aptela.com
>Cc: users <users at openser.org>
>Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:06:01 AM GMT-0600
>Subject: Re: [Users] Duplicate INVITEs
>
>Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote:
>
>
>>We're seeing sporadic situations where fones
>>a) send an INVITE
>>b) ignore the 100-Trying response, and instead
>>c) send another INVITE with the same sequence number.
>>
>>The question is, What should happen here?
>>
>>
>
>If the message is completely identical then it is a retransmission.
>Retransmissions should be detected by tm module (e.g. t_relay()) and
>absorbed,
>
>regards
>klaus
>
>
>
>
>>Currently, we send back a 500 response (server error).
>>Is this correct? (i think not, cause it invariably causes the fone to go fast busy).
>>Is this some other response that should occur?
>>
>>poring over 3261 resulted in a headache, and no additional clarity...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at openser.org
>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list