[Users] Request for Discussion: MI and FIFO

[Klaus Darilion]

IMO dropping old FIFO now is fine.

regards
klaus

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> with the adding of asynchronous reply feature in MI and MI_FIFO 
> implementation, the transition to MI was completed - all former FIFO 
> functions (old implementation) were ported to MI. Also all FIFO 
> capabilities were also ported to the new MI_FIFO module.
> 
> so, currently there are two FIFO implementations:
>    - the old one, directly in core.
>    - the new one, based on MI interface.
> 
> the old implementation is obsolete (all external management will be done 
> via MI) , so, at some point, it will be removed from OpenSER in order to 
> maintain consistency and avoid confusion between the two implementations 
> (as they are equivalent from user point of view - at the moment, at least).
> 
> my question is when to drop the old implementation? my personal 
> preference will be do doing ASAP as :
>    1) no functionality is lost
>    2) avoid confusion among users and the explanation overhead
>    3) it will force the testing of the new FIFO and MI implementation, 
> which will shorter the way to a stable form.
> 
> I would like to know also some other opinions.
> 
> regards,
> bogdan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


-- 
Klaus Darilion
nic.at