[Users] test openser behind NAT not work
somsak vattanavakin
somsak at infowavenet.com
Mon Dec 4 05:49:22 CET 2006
Hi Ravi
Thanks . after i saw log evenet on UAC .
i do not sure that ACK message from CALLER can not reach CALLEE so,after
about 30 second CALLEE HANGUP or not so i put some log .
in this case i do not sure also that my ADSL ROUTER(A) in front openser
server is OK to handle SIP messages or not.
i think but do not test concept. that ACK message from CALLER is not
handle propery . any idea
from CALLER UAC1(janny) file
-------(1) INVITE Response 180 Ringing it seem OK -----
[06-12-02]18:50:16.710 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "### Calling CreateAppDialog
### SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
192.168.100.101:6090;received=124.120.171.220;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-af3a3525d4477d15-1--d87543-;rport=57489
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.100.5;transport=tcp;lr;ftag=ec59120b>
Contact:
<sip:somsak at 124.120.171.220:57505;rinstance=c1da0732275186e1;transport=TCP>
To: ""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263
From: ""janny""<sip:janny at infowavenet.com>;tag=ec59120b
Call-ID: MTJhNGMzNmMyMTE1YTRkOWUzMGI4YjI4ZDJkNzRiY2E.
CSeq: 2 INVITE
User-Agent: X-Lite release 1006e stamp 34025
-------end (1)
----- (2) SEND ACK from UAC(1) to UAC(2) ------
-- it seem that CONTACT use public IP address but ???
[06-12-02]18:50:21.232 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSPORT | "Transmitting to [ V4
192.168.100.5:5060 TCP target domain=192.168.100.5 received on: Transport:
[ V4 0.0.0.0:6090 TCP target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]
connectionId=0 ] tlsDomain= via [ V4 192.168.100.101:6090 TCP target
domain=192.168.100.5 connectionId=0 ]ACK
sip:somsak at 124.120.171.220:57505;rinstance=c1da0732275186e1;transport=TCP
SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
192.168.100.101:6090;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c85e822254767701-1--d87543-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Route: <sip:192.168.100.5;transport=tcp;lr;ftag=ec59120b>
Contact: <sip:janny at 124.120.171.220:57489;transport=TCP>
To: ""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263
From: ""janny""<sip:janny at infowavenet.com>;tag=ec59120b
Call-ID: MTJhNGMzNmMyMTE1YTRkOWUzMGI4YjI4ZDJkNzRiY2E.
CSeq: 2 ACK
----- end (2)
------(3) OTHER ACK MESSAGES
[06-12-02]18:50:42.303 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSPORT |
"ConnectionBase::~ConnectionBase 02691E88" |
[06-12-02]18:50:42.303 | Info | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Sending
ConnectionTerminated 3 to TUs" |
[06-12-02]18:50:42.303 | Info | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Try sending request
to a different dns result" |
[06-12-02]18:50:42.303 | Info | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Ran out of dns
entries for 192.168.100.5. Send 503" |
[06-12-02]18:50:42.303 | Debug | RESIP | "Helper::makeResponse(SipReq:
ACK somsak at 124.120.171.220:57505 tid=c85e822254767701 cseq=ACK
contact=janny at 124.120.171.220:57489 / 2 from(tu) code=503 reason=" |
[06-12-02]18:50:42.304 | Warning | RESIP:DNS | "local hostname does not
contain a domain part" |
[06-12-02]18:50:42.304 | Debug | RESIP:TRANSACTION | "Send to TU: TU:
DialogUsageManager size=1 SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
192.168.100.101:6090;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c85e822254767701-1--d87543-;rport
To: ""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263
From: ""janny""<sip:janny at infowavenet.com>;tag=ec59120b
Call-ID: MTJhNGMzNmMyMTE1YTRkOWUzMGI4YjI4ZDJkNzRiY2E.
CSeq: 2 ACK
Warning: 499 IBT101 """"
Content-Length: 0
SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
192.168.100.101:6090;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c85e822254767701-1--d87543-;rport
To: ""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263
From: ""janny""<sip:janny at infowavenet.com>;tag=ec59120b
Call-ID: MTJhNGMzNmMyMTE1YTRkOWUzMGI4YjI4ZDJkNzRiY2E.
CSeq: 2 ACK
Warning: 499 IBT101 """"
Content-Length: 0
--------------- end (3)
----(4) BYE MESSAGE
--- same conact header use public IP ADDRESS
[06-12-02]18:51:00.658 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "SEND: BYE
sip:somsak at 124.120.171.220:57505;rinstance=c1da0732275186e1;transport=TCP
SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/ ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-5658db5aee54231a-1--d87543-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Route: <sip:192.168.100.5;transport=tcp;lr;ftag=ec59120b>
Contact: <sip:janny at 124.120.171.220:57489;addTransport>
To: ""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263
From: ""janny""<sip:janny at infowavenet.com>;tag=ec59120b
Call-ID: MTJhNGMzNmMyMTE1YTRkOWUzMGI4YjI4ZDJkNzRiY2E.
CSeq: 3 BYE
----- end(4)
from CALLEE UAC2(somsak) log file
----- (5) many Retransmit message for INVITE from UAC1
----- it seem that UAC2 do not receive ACK from UAC1 right ?
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
192.168.100.5;branch=z9hG4bK79e6.4fc365a5.0;received=124.120.168.128;i=f
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
192.168.100.101:6090;received=124.120.171.220;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-af3a3525d4477d15-1--d87543-;rport=57489
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.100.5;transport=tcp;lr=on;ftag=ec59120b>
Contact:
<sip:somsak at 124.120.171.220:57505;rinstance=c1da0732275186e1;transport=TCP>
To: ""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263
From: ""janny""<sip:janny at infowavenet.com>;tag=ec59120b
Call-ID: MTJhNGMzNmMyMTE1YTRkOWUzMGI4YjI4ZDJkNzRiY2E.
CSeq: 2 INVITE
----- end(5)
----(6) UAC2 send BYE message
[06-12-02]18:50:53.263 | Info | RESIP:DUM |
"""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263 Sending BYE ACK not
received" |
[06-12-02]18:50:53.263 | Debug | RESIP:DUM | "SEND: BYE
sip:janny at 124.120.171.220:57489;transport=TCP SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/ ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-7541b52459249e06-1--d87543-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Route: <sip:192.168.100.5;transport=tcp;lr=on;ftag=ec59120b>
Contact:
<sip:somsak at 124.120.171.220:57505;rinstance=c1da0732275186e1;transport=TCP>
To: ""janny""<sip:janny at infowavenet.com>;tag=ec59120b
From: ""somsak""<sip:somsak at infowavenet.com>;tag=17458263
Call-ID: MTJhNGMzNmMyMTE1YTRkOWUzMGI4YjI4ZDJkNzRiY2E.
CSeq: 2 BYE
User-Agent: X-Lite release 1006e stamp 34025
Reason: SIP;description=""ACK not received""
Content-Length: 0
---- end(6)
Somsak Vattanavakin
2753-7 Ladprao 99-101
Bangkok.10310 Thailand
Tel. (66)0-29350016 , 0-25386251
Fax. (66)0-25140253
www.infowavenet.com
> Hi Somsak
> The Same issue is faced ,
>
> The in ur FireWall/router, ...
> In Router , openSER system is in DMZ mode, i'm Sure , Even through u did
> like that...
>
> ADSL(A) Router is mis place the HeaderContact
>
> Change the Router... with Support the SIP with NAT... Cisco , Linksys,
> Zoom,
>
> can u check the Dialog file UAC ( x-lite 3.0) ... U can see there for
> invited... Ack and Bye Contact Header is misplacing into the private
> ip,,,,,,
>
> Keep OpenSER direct to the Internet ( for testing ) ............
> it will work finely........
>
sorry i can not direct INTERNET connect
> On 12/2/06, somsak vattanavakin <somsak at infowavenet.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>>
>> i will setup openser behind NAT like these
>>
>>
>>
>> OPENSER ---> ADSL ROUTER(A) <---> INTERNET <---> ADSL ROUTER(B)<--
>> UAC(1)
>> <--
>> UAC(2)
>>
>>
>>
>> for UAC to talk each others in the same network with OPENSER server and
>> try to REGISTER AND INVITE IT OK .
>>
>> but if i use UACs that located behind ADSL ROUTER(B) for REGISTER it OK
>> when UAC(1) INVITE UAC(2) it RING and session established can heard
>> sound
>>
>> but after about 30 second the CALLEE UAC(2) is HANG UP while
>> CALLER UAC(1)
>> still show established
>>
>> i saw some mail said that the problem may occour from ADSL ROUTER ITSELF
>> (AGL problem)or some say that ACK problem. if i connect UAC(1) and
>> UAC(2)
>> through ADSL ROUTER(B) to iptel.org and i use UAC(1) INVITE UAC(2) it
>> work
>> no problem for 30 second disconnection . also if i use UAC(1) and
>> UAC(2)
>> conect to iptel.org through ADSL ROUTER(A) no problem . AT this point
>> can I CONCLUDE THAT BOTH ADSL ROUTER NO PROBLEM FOR SIP CONNECTION. is
>> it
>> TRUE ??
>>
>>
>> Next i saw from LOG file it seem no ACK MESSAGE and error like these
>> -- LOG FILE -------------
>> ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: poll error: flags 18
>> ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: SO_ERROR (111) Connection refused
>> ERROR: tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed
>> ERROR: tcp_send: connect failed
>> ---
>>
>> for simply NAT testing i use openser.cfg like these
>>
>> ---------- OPENSER.CFG ---------
>> if (!method=="REGISTER")
>> record_route();
>> if (loose_route()) {
>> # mark routing logic in request
>> append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
>> route(1);
>> };
>>
>> if (!uri==myself) {
>> # mark routing logic in request
>> append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
>> route(1);
>> };
>>
>> if (uri==myself) {
>> if (method=="REGISTER") {
>>
>> if (!www_authorize("infowavenet.com", "subscriber")) {
>> www_challenge("infowavenet.com", "0");
>> exit;
>> };
>> fix_nated_register();
>> save("location");
>> exec_msg("cat >> /tmp/test");
>> exit;
>> };
>>
>> lookup("aliases");
>> if (!uri==myself) {
>> append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
>> route(1);
>> };
>>
>> # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC
>> DB
>> if (!lookup("location")) {
>> sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
>> exit;
>> };
>> append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
>> };
>> route(1);
>> }
>>
>>
>> route[1] {
>> # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably
>> # even for UDP2TCP
>> fix_nated_contact();
>> if(method == "INVITE")
>> { fix_nated_sdp("3"); }
>> if (!t_relay()) {
>> sl_reply_error();
>> } else { exec_msg("cat >> /tmp/test");}
>> exit;
>> }
>> ------------
>>
>>
>> MY QUESTION:
>>
>> 1) can openser server is BEHIND NAT ADSL ROUTER and receive Call from
>> UAC from other NAT ROUTER .
>>
>> 2) if so what the problem that CALLEE HANGUP every 30 seconds
>> ( i use XLITE v.3 for UAC )
>>
>> 3) if it possible can you fix openser.cfg that work for this situation
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Somsak Vattanavakin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Ravi Prakash Sunkara
> ravi.sunkara at hyperion-tech.com
> M:+91 9985077535
> O:+91 40 23114549
> F:+91 40 40208727
> ravi.sunkara at hyperion-tech.com
> www.hyperion-tech.com
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list