[Serusers] RTP Proxy errors

sip sip at arcdiv.com
Thu Aug 31 14:52:09 CEST 2006


Identical results, I'm afraid (and it appears to be the same version I was using). 

I disabled the firewalls on both machines for testing just to be sure there wasn't a port somewhere I was missing. I tried using the base config from the nathelper module src dir.  Both to no avail. 

N.
 

On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:59:56 +0200, Greger V. Teigre wrote
> Hm. You get the response back.
> Can you try the rtpproxy found in the onsip.org everything package?Just copy the rtpproxy code directory and don't do cvsupdate.
> That version is verified to run with 0.9.x, so if it don't work, wehave ruled out that as a problem.
> g-)
> 
> sip wrote: Doing a tcp dump on the ser server to look for the replies, I get: 14:40:02.390249 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56137: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.395230 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56138: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.461615 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56139: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.497716 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56140: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.499642 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56141: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.509856 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56142: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.520871 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56143: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.531844 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56144: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.542842 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56145: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.553835 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56146: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.564832 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56147: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.575829 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56148: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.586823 media!
 .server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56149: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.597823 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56150: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.608824 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56151: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.619815 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56152: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.630812 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56153: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.641807 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56154: udp 17 (DF)14:40:02.652802 media.server.com.22222 > ser.server.com.56155: udp 17 (DF)etc, etc. Does that mean anything to anyone? (incidentally, I'm running version 0.9.6 of SER and rtpproxy responds with:Basic version: 20040107Extension 20050322: Support for multiple RTP streams and MOH )N.On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:31:29 +0200, Greger Viken Teigre wrote   Good description of your problem. Made me answer directly from my nokia e70 :-) There was a protocol change in rtpproxy and you may have a mismatch there. AFAIK, nathelper in cvs head uses the new protocol, but 0.9.x doe!
 s not. Your rtpproxy announces the old version, but the error message 
looks as if the version never reaches ser. Do a tcpdump src port 22222 to catch the answer on your ser server.g-)------- Original message -------From: sip <sip at arcdiv.com>Sent: 30.8.'06, 14:20   So... I followed the instructions on OnSip on how to set up RTPProxy. However, I made a modification because I'm running it on a differentmachine... changing the modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "unix:/var/run/rtpptoxy.sock")to modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:XX.XX.XX.XX:22222")I've run RTPproxy on the remote machine as such:./rtpproxy -f -l XX.XX.XX.XX -s udp:* 22222And it's running. I start the ser server, and I see a slew of commands hit the RTPProxy console:received command "26742_0 V"sending reply "26742_0 20040107"received command "26745_0 V"sending reply "26745_0 20040107"received command "26791_0 V"sending reply "26791_0 20040107"received command "26797_0 V"sending reply "26797_0 20040107"received command "26748_0 V"sending reply "26748_0 20040107"received c!
 ommand "26750_0 V"sending reply "26750_0 20040107"received command "26751_0 V"sending reply "26751_0 20040107"received command "26752_0 V"sending reply "26752_0 20040107"received command "26784_0 V"sending reply "26784_0 20040107etc, etc ad infinitumAfter a moment, the SER console spits back: ug 30 14:07:48 death ser[26742]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:48 death ser[26742]: WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of theRTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:48 death ser[26742]: WARNING: rtpp_test: support for RTP proxyhas been disabled temporarily Aug 30 14:07:48 death ser[26745]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:48 death ser[26745]: WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of theRTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:48 death ser[26745]: WARNING: rtpp_test: support for RTP proxyhas been disabled temporarily Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26791]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49!
  death ser[26791]: WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of theRTP pro
xy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26791]: WARNING: rtpp_test: support for RTP proxyhas been disabled temporarily Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26797]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26797]: WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of theRTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26797]: WARNING: rtpp_test: support for RTP proxyhas been disabled temporarily Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26748]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26748]: WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of theRTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26748]: WARNING: rtpp_test: support for RTP proxyhas been disabled temporarily Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26750]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26751]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26752]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 3!
 0 14:07:49 death ser[26784]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26789]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy Aug 30 14:07:49 death ser[26792]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: timeout waitingreply from a RTP proxy etc, etc, ad infinitumI've done a search on this on Google and found a couple of people with thesame questions and NO people responding with answers. Any ideas what's going on? N._______________________________________________Serusers mailing listSerusers at lists.iptel.orghttp://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060831/9ee8f128/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list