[Serusers] Via Format?

[Ricardo Martinez]

Hello Valentin.
	Thanks for your answer.
	So, according to your comment the correct format should be something like this ? :
	
	Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060;branch=z9hG4bK-aef982198ef98a981 , SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814

?????
Thanks again! 
Regards,

Ricardo Martinez.-


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Valentin Nechayev [mailto:netch at portaone.com]
Enviado el: martes, 29 de agosto de 2006 1:28
Para: Ricardo Martinez
CC: serusers at iptel.org
Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Via Format?


 Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:13:17, rmartinez wrote about "[Serusers] Via Format?": 

> Hello list.
> 	Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
> 	
> 	Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?

> 	Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814 

Yes, multiple values can be grouped in one header, but the first
Via value lacks branch; it's real violation of RFC3261. (Seems it
is allowed by RFC2543, but 2543 is rather obsoleted)

> It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...

-- 
Valentin Nechayev
PortaOne Inc., Software Engineer
mailto:netch at portaone.com