[Serusers] rewrite the From part of SIP INVITE messages
Greger V. Teigre
greger at teigre.com
Mon Aug 28 17:23:26 CEST 2006
Your subst command probably preserve the tag (as it should). If not, you
would definitely get a problem...
g-)
Ricardo Carvalho wrote:
> I've used subst() function for substituting From and To URIs and calls
> succeed well! I think that this indicates that Ser uses in fact only
> the Call-Id to keep track of calls and not as well From and To tags of
> messages. Although I agree... this may end up biting me later... It
> got to be a question of compromises between pros and cons!
>
> Greetings,
>
> Ricardo.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>> NEVER manipulate From/To so that tag=something disappears!! Per
>> RFC3261, a dialog is the combination of these two tags and Call-Id.
>> On branching and reINVITE, the Call-Id will stay the same, while the
>> tags may change. This is relevant for accounting, for keeping track
>> of branches, failures, and is absolutely necessary for the UAs to
>> recognize the dialog.
>> The old RFC uses the full content of From/To for the same purposes,
>> thus manipulating From/To will break your backwards suport for
>> UACs/UASs that do not support RFC3261. This means that in a
>> closed-wall deployment and all UAS/UAC support RFC3261, you MAY
>> manipulate From/To, but it's not recommended and may well end up
>> biting you later...
>> g-)
>>
>> Alexandr Dubovikov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:55:41PM +0100, rcarvalho at iric.up.pt wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm sceptic about the use of functions that replace parts of SIP
>>>> messages,
>>>> because that way, will Ser still keep record of transactions? Won?t
>>>> those
>>>> replacements affect Ser to recognise to whom route subsequent
>>>> messages?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, we already discused here about it one week ago. From, To and
>>> Call-ID make a Call Leg of transaction. I am not sure, but ser tm
>>> based only on Call-ID and
>>> ignore To/From fields.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wbr,
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list