[Serusers] Multihomed SER & NAT

[Sebastian Gabris]

Hi all,

finally I figured out how to change the sdp - part of the message by using force_rtpproxy.

All works fine, I can make calls in both directions, but i still got two problems:

1. If someone from outside(VoIP - Provider) calls my UA, i have a ~10 sec. delay before i hear audio.
- i checked my dumpfile, and saw that the delay is between the last 180 Ringing and the 200 OK.
(- However RTP - Packets are sent before the 200 OK, after a 183-Message. Dont understand why but I dont think it matters that much.)

2. If the call is terminated from outside(VoIP - Provider) the BYE message is not handled correctly by SER.
- the previous messages from the Voip provider have all a via HF with the private IP of my UA. The BYE message doesnt have such a Via. All other Via and RR fields are present.
- also the BYE uri is somewaht strange. Instead of sip:123456 at privateIPofUA it contains sip:123456 at publicIPofSER.

Thanks in advance for any help Smile

Best regards
Sebastian.

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com>
> Gesendet: 10.08.06 15:41:31
> An: Sebastian Gabris <Sebastian.Gabris at web.de>
> CC: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Betreff: Re: [Serusers] Multihomed SER & NAT

fix_nated_contact() is meant for changing the IP address of the Contact
> header when SER has a public address and the UA has a private (i.e.
> behind NAT). This means that it will rewrite Contact to contain the
> source ip address:port found in the UDP/TCP header.
> This is probably correct, because I assume the UA cannot be reached
> from the outside anyway. If you record-route, subsequent requests
> should go through your ser.
> 
> If you have problems with responses not being returned, have a look at
> Via headers as they control how answers to i.e an INVITE are routed
> back to the UA.  You may want to have a look at the rr module double
> record route parameter to make sure that SER creates one record-route
> for the internal and one for the external interface.
> g-)
> 
> Sebastian Gabris wrote:
>  After reading a bit more mails, I came to two possible problems:
> 1. fix_nated_contact() needs a registrar to work properly
>  I dont use a registrar, since i register at the VoIP - Provider.
> or
> 2. fix_nated_contact() is not ment to be used on this scenario
> Any ideas on this?
> Sebastian
>  
>  
>  Hi everybody,
> need some help on nattraversal.
> i use a multihomed SER, one private IP & one public IP.
> MyUA(privateIP) <-> (privateIP)SER(publicIP) <-> UA-(VoIP - Provider, pubicIP)
> If i try to make a call from private net to public net, SER doesnt change the contact address. He changes the sdp - connection field but he, puts in the wrong IP - address.
> Instead o writing down his public IP, SER writes his private IP.
> Then SER forwards the call on his public interface to the provider, which will get wrong Contact & SDP information.
> After reviewing my logs i saw that SER does the nat_uac_test, but the fix_nat_contact & fix_sdp dont work dont do what they should do :)
>  Here are the important bits of my config:
>  fork=yes
> log_stderror=no mhomed=1
> listen=10.x.x.x
> listen=193.x.x.x
> loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
> modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
> modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s
> modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT
>  if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
>  if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) {
>  log(2,"LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling
>  if (method == "INVITE") {
>  fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP
>  };
>  force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via
>  setflag(6); # Mark as NATed
>  };
>  };
> ... and so on.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
> Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>  
>  
>  
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
> http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000071
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>  
> 


______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193