[Users] Accounting wrong BYEs

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Klaus Darilion wrote:

> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>
>> was referring to a forking scenario:
>>
>> UAC           P                UAS
>>              <----------------- 180 from UAS1
>> <--------------                             <----------------- 183 
>> from UAS1
>> <--------------
>>              <----------------- 180 from UAS2
>> <---x---x---x--                  this will not be relayed to UAC 
>> since a higher reply code was already sent,
>>                                 so the UAS2 will not be visible
>>
>> regards,
>> bogdan
>>
>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> First of all the UAC may not discover all the branches based on 
>>>> To-tag - there might be branches that haven't sent any reply, or 
>>>> replies were absorbed by the forking server (ex: 180 after 183 will 
>>>> not be relayed).
>>>
>
> Is this standard conform? What about
>
> UAC                        P                UAS
>  <----------------- 183 from UAS1  <--------------
>           ????      180 from UAS1  <--------------
>
> Will this be forwarded?
>
no, it will not be forwarded.

regards,
bogdan