[Serusers] Re: [Users] branch route

[Mark Aiken]

Regarding the reINVITE - I've seen a number of UAs that dont return all rr
parms in the subsequent Route. If your configuration depends on this feature
you will have problems with these UAs. FYI - Asterisk prior to about 4 weeks
ago has this problem. Also some WiFi SIP phones.
 If you want to use the UA to save proprietary dialog/call stateful info
this way (in rr params) you will need to carefully test the UAs used in your
network.
 Mark
 On 9/26/05, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> if it's safe or not call add_rr_param() from branch_route is an already
> debated subject. See:
> http://www.openser.org/pipermail/devel/2005-September/000573.html
>
> Shortly you may not call it from failure route or from branch route
> triggered from a failure route(so no serial forking. But you can safely
> use it from a branch_route triggered by a request route.
>
> This problem will be fixed as soon as the cvs is forked for the new
> upcoming release.
>
> regarding the future behaviour in failure route - if you do
> add_rr_param() in branch route, this change will not be visible in the
> failure_route - actually any change from branch route will not be
> visible in failure route.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Richard Z wrote:
>
> > Hi Bogdan,
> >
> > Can add_rr_param be called from branch_route? It is needed for later
> > processing of re-INVITE.
> >
> > If SDP is different for each branch, what would it be for the failure
> > route in a serial forking senario? Is the message reverted back to its
> > original content? That brings another question... can these functions
> > be called from failure_route?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > On 9/26/05, *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu* <bogdan at voice-system.ro
> > <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > to implement per branch NAT traversal, you need several thing,
> > additional to branch route:
> > - per branch flags - these are available in the current
> > testing/developing branch (cvs head) - see
> > http://www.openser.org/pipermail/devel/2005-September/000515.html
> > - nathelper/mediaproxy functions to be allowed to be called from
> > branch route - for the moment I see no problem with doing this, but I
> > will have to double check before setting proper function allowances.
> >
> > regards,
> > bogdan
> >
> > Richard Z wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to figure out how to use branch route for nat traversal.
> > > If a subscriber registers from multiple locations, a branch route is
> > > called after lookup. For example, if locations include UAs
> > behind same
> > > NAT and different NAT, i'd like to invoke any rtp/media-proxy
> > > accordingly in branch_route[], . However they can't be called
> > inside a
> > > branch_route. What's the best way to do this?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Richard
> > >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Users mailing list
> > > Users at openser.org <mailto:Users at openser.org>
> > >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050926/f1490f17/attachment-0001.htm>