[Serusers] From header

[Kapil Dhawan]

Hey

I have tested Quintum..Analog and Digital both...Digital has no issues now 
while Analog boxes give you pain. Talk to Quintum...these guys are real nice 
to respond.


>From: "Neill Wilkinson" <neill.wilkinson at btinternet.com>
>To: "'Rick Thompson'" <rthompson at vir2com.com>,"'Iqbal'" 
><iqbal at gigo.co.uk>,"'Klaus Darilion'" <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>
>CC: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>Subject: RE: [Serusers] From header
>Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:29:24 +0100
>
>
>Got Quntum Asterisk and SER working together happily - ASM200, AXM800, CMS.
>
>Happy to share. Been a real pain making calls work and the Quintum Failover
>too. But all hanging together for my service.
>
>Neill....;o)
>
>
>Neill Wilkinson
>Senior Consultant
>Quortex Consultants Ltd
>e: neill.wilkinson at quortex.com
>w: www.quortex.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
>Behalf Of Rick Thompson
>Sent: 06 September 2005 18:59
>To: 'Iqbal'; 'Klaus Darilion'
>Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>Subject: RE: [Serusers] From header
>
>
>Interesting. I have a number of Quintum PSTN gateways that I'm trying to
>pass traffic through using SER and I am having a heck of a time with the
>configuration. Asterisk works fine but not scaleable enough. My UAC's are
>behind different NAT routers and some work with rtpproxy and some don't.
>Some work (Linksys) with just nathelper but wouldn't work with rtpproxy.
>Does anyone have a good experience with SER and Quintum? I would like to
>share info and experience.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
>Behalf Of Iqbal
>Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:28 PM
>To: Klaus Darilion
>Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
>
>its REGISTER to the proxy
>
>Iqbal
>
>Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
> > If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone"
> > SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this
> > is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
> >
> > klaus
> >
> > Iqbal wrote:
> >
> >> just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA
> >> is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own
> >> IP address
> >>
> >> Iqbal
> >>
> >> Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >>
> >>> The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the
> >>> public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002 at iptel.org
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> klaus
> >>>
> >>> Iqbal wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the
> >>>> domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the
> >>>> proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a
> >>>> quintum, and wanted to double check
> >>>>
> >>>> Iqbal
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Serusers mailing list
> >>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > .
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>---
>avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
>Virus Database (VPS): 0537-1, 14/09/2005
>Tested on: 18/09/2005 12:29:25
>avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software.
>http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

_________________________________________________________________
Win 5 Gold Coins & prizes worth Lakhs on eBay. 
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/4686-26272-10936-630?ck=GoldRush Register 
Now!