[Serusers] Re: [Users] branch route

[Juha Heinanen]

Mark Aiken writes:

 > For me that was not an option. Especially when the same UAs work with other
 > commercial SBC used for far-end NAT solutions. If you can chose your UAs
 > then thats great. Liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send
 > - work for everyone.

it is ok for ser to be liberal and accept invalid stuff.  this is
something else, i.e., it is the UA does not process correctly rr headers
and violates rfc3261 where it is VERY explicitly said that any rr
parameters MUST be preserved.  such UAs are therefore welcome to shoot
themselves.

-- juha