[Users] BYE method accompanied by error

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Tue Oct 11 18:39:29 CEST 2005


looks like a dialog matching problem. for further inspection complete 
SIP dums would be necessary:
ngrep port 5060

klaus

Brandon Price wrote:
> I find that I am having the same error, although with me it only  
> happens when the sip client is natted and the bye comes from the pstn  
> end. Sample tethereal capture below. I can only assume this has  
> something to do with the nat module which I am currently not using  yet 
> but plan to try again to implement today.
> 
> 48.022862 216.120.255.29 -> 8.11.1.7     SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip: 
> 15187278584 at ser1.manhattan.vtnoc.net, with session description
> 48.026850     8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP Status: 100 trying --  your 
> call is important to us
> 48.027059     8.11.1.7 -> oursippproxy.net  SIP/SDP Request: INVITE  
> sip:+15187278584 at oursippproxy.net, with session description
> 48.096933  oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7     SIP Status: 100 Trying
> 49.299563  oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7     SIP/SDP Status: 183  Session 
> Progress, with session description
> 49.300461     8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP/SDP Status: 183 Session  
> Progress, with session description
> 56.407921  oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7     SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK,  
> with session description
> 56.409252     8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK, with  
> session description
> 56.428281 216.120.255.29 -> 8.11.1.7     SIP Request: ACK  
> sip:oursippproxy.net:5060;transport=udp
> 56.464595     8.11.1.7 -> oursippproxy.net  SIP Request: ACK  
> sip:oursippproxy.net:5060;transport=udp
> 61.956533  oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7     SIP Request: BYE sip: 
> 15184782411 at 216.120.255.29:5060
> 61.957965     8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP Request: BYE sip: 
> 15184782411 at 216.120.255.29:5060
> 61.987385 216.120.255.29 -> 8.11.1.7     SIP Status: 481 Call Leg/ 
> Transaction Does Not Exist
> 62.017630     8.11.1.7 -> oursippproxy.net  SIP Status: 481 Call Leg/ 
> Transaction Does Not Exist
> 
> On Oct 11, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Iqbal wrote:
> 
>> Can you check to see if you have already received a BYE for that  
>> call, some phones I had were sending there own Bye's after the GW had
>>
>> Iqbal
>>
>> Sam Lee wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>  I would like to know why does my BYE method are always replied  with 
>>> a 'Call Leg/Transaction does not exist' . How do they compare  
>>> whether the transaction in the BYE method exist or not ? ( tag?  ftag 
>>> ? ) Are there any thing in the config that might cause this  kind of 
>>> problem ? Just want to highlight that all the calls are  made in a 
>>> good condition, everything except when the call is ending.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you dont understand.
>>>  Regards,
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> ---
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at openser.org
>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 





More information about the sr-users mailing list