[Serusers] Re: [Users] AVPs are lost on relayed INVITE errors

[Klaus Darilion]

Some time ago I had some problems with accounting of failed transactions 
vs. missed transactions. I could solve them by using a dedicated flag 
for every parameter.

regards
klaus

Federico Giannici wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> have you set the flag to log missed transaction?
>> http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.0.x/acc.html#AEN407
> 
> 
> No, I set the following:
> 
> modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1)
> modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
> 
> But no "db_missed_flag".
> Anyway:
> 
> 1) I don't want to log missed calls in a separate table.
> 
> 2) The failed INVITEs are actually logged in the normal table, but the 
> AVPs I set are not logged (it seems that they are not found).
> 
> In normal cases the AVP are correctly logged. Even in many error cases 
> (404, and so on) they are logged too. But in some cases, with strange 
> errors (488, 422), the AVPs are NOT logged (accounting is done, but AVPs 
> are "n\a")!
> 
> Any explanation of this?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
>> Or is that the some avps are not any more stored for failed 
>> transaction? Maybe some snippets of your config will give us more 
>> hints about what happens there.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 11/26/05 14:04, Federico Giannici wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using OpenSER 1.0.0 on OpenBSD 3.7 amd64.
>>>
>>> I have a strange problem with the accounting: I set a couple of AVPs 
>>> for every message that arrives at the server. I'm sure they are there 
>>> because they are written in the syslog logging. Sometimes, when an 
>>> INVITE is relayed (with transactions) and receives an error (488, 
>>> 422, etc.), in the SQL logging there is no more presence of the AVPs!
>>> Is this a known problem?
>>> How can I avoid this?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
> 
>