[Users] open letter (2)

[Klaus Darilion]

harry gaillac wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
> 
> 
> 
>>Please do not cross post. Split your problems into
>>smaller problems and 
>>ask them on the correspondig list.
> 
> 
> I mail my question to asterisk, openser ser  lists

I think one of your biggest problems is your poor english. What does the 
above sentence mean? I know that you post to all this list because I 
really get flooded by your emails.

Or do you mean that you give a shit on my advice and still spamming all 
the lists with your emails (getting the responses you are used to)?

>>After all your emails, I still have no glue what
>>your scenario is. Why 
>>do you want to host ser+asterisk+NAT on the same
>>device?
> 
> pass through
> I agree my english is not very good sorry i try my
> best .
> 
> Asterisk don't provide IM/presence unlike ser however
> ser don't provide telephony features like MOH ACD call
> parked IVR and more 
> 
> I want my sip agents to provide these features.
> Ser handle sip routing asterisk telephony features .

Have you ever used SIP clients with presence and IM? I suggest to setup 
ser (without Asterisk) just to test the IM features. SIP based 
IM/presence implementations are very poor yet.

>>Should the Asterisk/ser be reachable also from the
>>public interface? If 
>>not, why do you need NAT traversal at all?
> 
> 
> In fact  i have got a single machine for my tests .
> Ser handle sip routing so incoming or outgoing
> requests pass through SER not directly to asterisk .
> 
> I need nat support for sip agents behind nat.

In your picture, the NAT router is on the same PC as ser and asterisk. 
Is this correct?

what scenario do you have? Are all the users behding the same NAT (in 
the same subnet) and you provide VoIP within this network (e.g. an 
enterprise) or do you have external users (e.g. like iptel or 
freeworlddialup)?


>>Why do you use both? Asterisk can also do NAT
>>traversal. For how many 
>>users is the setup?
> 
> 
> I think asterisk support 255 users
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>klaus
>>
>>harry gaillac wrote:
>>
>>>Dear users,
>>>
>>>This letter is addressed to the most experienced
>>
>>users
>>
>>>for the  ser openser and asterisk projects.
>>>
>>>Advice me and I'll stop to mail my question.
>>>
>>>How a session between two user agents behind nat
>>
>>could
>>
>>>stay in the path ?
>>>
>>>Harry
>>>Kinds Regards
>>>
>>>        |register |            | register   | 
>>
>>agent1 
>>
>>>asterisk|         |ser/nat box |            |
>>>        | 200 OK  |            |    200 OK  | 
>>
>>agent2 
>>
>>>
>>>              One box
>>>     ---------------------------
>>>     |  ----------------       |
>>>     |  | asterisk pbx |       | 
>>>     |  ----------------       |
>>>     |        ||               |
>>>     |  ----------    ----------
>>>     |  |   SER  |====|NAT box |==== private
>>
>>network
>>
>>>     |  ----------    ----------
>>>     ---------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>	
>>>
>>>	
>>>		
>>>
>>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> 
>>>Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le
>>
>>nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
>>
>>>Téléchargez cette version sur
>>
>>http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Users mailing list
>>>Users at openser.org
>>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 	
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________________________ 
> Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
> Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
> 
>