[Serusers] Ser+Nat +Polycom phones

[Greger V. Teigre]

That's strange. We are using some Polycom 300 and they work ok. No STUN 
support and sometimes a very erratic registration pattern, but except from 
that, they seem to perform ok.  They interoperate with sipuras, 
grandstreams, sjphone, cisco gw, xlite, etc.
g-)

Juha Heinanen wrote:
> harry,
>
> we tried polycom video phones a month or so ago and their sip
> implementation was worst i had seen so far.  the phones didn't support
> digest authentication and we were also hit the problem you mentioned
> with domain in request-uri.  i suggest to junk those phones before
> their sip implementation is closer to rfc3261.
>
> -- juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers