[Serusers] SER b2bua agent (+more)?

[Wojciech Ziniewicz]

so ok.. it,s my phones case since they are rather old and cheap :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iqbal [mailto:iqbal at gigo.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:32 PM
> To: Wojciech Ziniewicz
> Cc: 'serusers at lists.iptel.org'
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER b2bua agent (+more)?
> 
> 
> ur sipphones should be deciding the RTP port, u can usually 
> set them to 
> pick a random port from a range.
> 
> iqbal
> 
> Wojciech Ziniewicz wrote:
> 
> >questions inline
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Iqbal [mailto:iqbal at gigo.co.uk]
> >>Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:34 PM
> >>To: Wojciech Ziniewicz
> >>Cc: 'serusers at lists.iptel.org'
> >>Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER b2bua agent (+more)?
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>2. I've got simple pstn model 
> >>>
> >>>LAN ---> SER 
> >>>      \         |   
> >>>        \       |
> >>>	PSTN
> >>>
> >>>I get simple disconnetion and loose rtp stream when calling 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>out to PSTN when
> >>    
> >>
> >>>making more than 5 calls.
> >>>
> >>>I don't actually know whether it's SER or my E1 Gateway 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>problem. Logs from
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Linksys PAP2 tells me that it's the "RTP PORT DUPLICATE" . 
> He's right
> >>>because the sniffer tells the same . I see that two phones 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>connect their RTP
> >>    
> >>
> >>>stream on port 3000.
> >>>
> >>>Any ideas ?
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Um..nope, it should not be a problem with SER, because SER 
> >>really does 
> >>not care about the RTP stream, and 5 connections to ser is really 
> >>nothing, I think its in linksys, I dont use the device 
> >>myself, but does 
> >>it have a limit on how many natted clients can sit behind it 
> >>(assuming u 
> >>r using NAT) or how many DHCP connections (I had this problem 
> >>once), or 
> >>even how many RTP streams it can handle
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I mean - my Sipphones connected to syslog say :
> >"RTP PORT DUP:30000" 
> >but my E1 Gateway (Multitech Multivoip3010) does not say 
> anything. It looks
> >like allocation of RTP is not random - every phone wants to 
> get on port
> >30000. Any ideas (again) ?
> >
> >I'm quite sure it's not SER's case, but who knows.
> >
> >.
> >
> >  
> >
>