[Serusers] More on load balancing: LVS + SRVs, SER + Asterisk

[Iqbal]

would lvs do this, I mean doesnt it have a problem with udp/SIP judging
by the threads u mentioned and those on lvs list.



Iqbal

On 5/12/2005, "Juha Heinanen" <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:

>Pietro Ravasio writes:
>
> > When UA_A calls UA_B, its INVITE will reach the same SER it has previously
> > registered to (SER_1, thanks to LVS persistence), SER_1 will then look for
> > UA_B and will notice that it is registered as UA_B at ser2.domain.com, DNS will
> > be queried and SER_2 will be contacted in order to handle INVITE and send it
> > to UA_B through already opened UDP channel (resolving NAT).
>
>what happens if ser_1 or ser_2 is down when this call takes place?
>
> > Have you got any suggestion/comment?
>
>i don't at all like an idea of mixing a third component (asterisk) to
>this.  the whole thing should be doable with sers and load balancers
>alone.
>
>-- juha
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>