[Serusers] Loose routing question

[Martin Koenig]

Hello,

from my experience, the following setup works securely for a proxy that 
wants to be:

a) NOT an outbound proxy
b) RFC3261 compilant loose router

if (loose_route() && has_totag() && method != "REGISTER") {
  t_relay();
}

IMHO, it doesn't make much sense to make the same machine a outbound 
proxy and local registrar, because you will most likely run into NAT 
problems. One needs direct signaling between user and proxy.

Regards,
Martin


Klaus Darilion wrote:

> Juha Heinanen wrote:
>
>> Klaus Darilion writes:
>>
>>  > Out of curiosity, how do you handle out-of dialog requests with a 
>>  > pre-set route? If I would allow them, I would handle it this way:
>>
>> something like that, but of course you would need to allow also requests
>> to your local users from foreign users (unless you have a walled 
>> garden).
>
>
> ACK. But still I see no reason why an incoming call for example will 
> use a pre-route set?
>
> regards,
> klaus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers