[Serusers] Problem starting ser 0.9.0

[Alex Vishnev]

Paul,

You are absolutely correct. For some reason, I found the offending block to
be this. 
if (src_ip==193.175.135.0/24){
                force_send_socket(smaug:5080);
                forward(193.175.135.179);
                break;
        }
it is part of the original config and I did not even modify it. when I
delete this block, everything started. Any ideas?


Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:43 AM
To: Alex Vishnev
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Problem starting ser 0.9.0

Error -478 usually indicates that there is an invalid IP address in
your ser.cfg file.

Regards,
Paul


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:37:39 -0500, Alex Vishnev <avishnev at optonline.net>
wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to start ser 0.9.0 on linux rh 9.0. the only thing I modified
in
> ser.cfg is listen address and debug information. However, I am getting an
> error starting ser
> 
> debug=3         # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
> fork=no
> log_stderror=yes
> listen=64.243.115.157
> 
> # hostname matching an alias will satisfy the condition uri==myself".
> alias=64.243.115.157
> 
> check_via=no    # (cmd. line: -v)
> dns=no           # (cmd. line: -r)
> rev_dns=no      # (cmd. line: -R)
> port=5060
> #children=4
> fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
> 
> the error I am getting is
> [root at voip ser]# ser
> Listening on
>              udp: 64.243.115.157 [64.243.115.157]:5060
>              tcp: 64.243.115.157 [64.243.115.157]:5060
> Aliases:
>              tcp: voip:5060
>              udp: voip:5060
>              *: 64.243.115.157:*
> 
> WARNING: no fork mode
> stateless - initializing
>  0(0) Maxfwd module- initializing
> ERROR: error -478 while trying to fix configuration
> 
> I think it is failing on this line in the config file but I don't know
why.
> 
> # initial sanity checks -- messages with
>         # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
>         if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
>                 sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
>                 break;
>         };
> 
> Any Ideas?
> 
> Alex
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
> Behalf Of Java Rockx
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:29 AM
> To: Marian Dumitru
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] uac_auth module??
> 
> Thank you very kindly sir!
> 
> Regards,
> Paul
> 
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:31:41 +0200, Marian Dumitru
> <marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro> wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > There is no uac_auth module - uac_auth is a function within the UAC
> module.
> > The UAC module contains more UAC feature than from replacement - see
> > Ramona's email from original commit; also please refer to the module
> > README to find more about its capabilities.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Marian
> >
> > Java Rockx wrote:
> > > Have either of you seen that post in the forum asking where to find
> > > something called the "uac_auth" module?
> > >
> > > If so can you reply to that post dated 2005/3/14 ?
> > >
> > > I did some Google searching and cannot find any mention of the module.
> > > I don't think the poster is referring to the new uac module in CVS
> > > head for altering the <From> header.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Paul
> >
> > --
> > Voice System
> > http://www.voice-system.ro
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>