[Serusers] parallel forking best practice?

[Daniel Poulsen]

Hi-

I have an alias that points to multiple destinations.  When one of
those destinations is offline.  SER calls failure_route for the leg 1,
but leg 2 rings the SIP UA.  failure_route sends the call to
voicemail, so the SIP UA from leg 2 rings just once and the call ends.

How are other handling this?  Is there a way to see if the call has
been parallelly (<-- ???) forked before failure_route gets called?

Dan

ps. How does one adverbize 'parallel'?


On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:32:36 +0100, Jan Janak <jan at iptel.org> wrote:
> On 23-02 08:00, Jev wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > For the 0_9_0 branch, what is the 'best practice' for implementing
> > parallel forking?
> >
> > We used to be able to point one alias at several accounts, but that
> > feature has regressed.
> 
>   It is still possible in 0.9.0, just make sure that you have a single
>   alias pointing to several destinations. lookup would automatically add
>   all of them to the destination set and t_relay would fork the request.
> 
>     Jan.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>