[Serusers] NAT & nathelper w/o rtp proxy

[Java Rockx]

Yes. Mediaproxy and rtpproxy receive RTP data and forward it on to the
other party in the call.

Regards,
Paul


On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:01:40 +0100, Martin van den Berg
<martinvdberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!  But does mediaproxy relay the RTP?
> 
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:35:37 -0500, Java Rockx <javarockx at gmail.com> wrote:
> > For NAT traversal you can either use nathelper + rtproxy __OR__ mediaproxy.
> >
> > So the answer to your question is, yes you need nathelper to use
> > rtpproxy because the force_rtp_proxy() function is in the nathlper
> > module.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:43:14 +0100, Martin van den Berg
> > <martinvdberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello Gurus,
> > >
> > > I'm running a lill' SER server(to which I am a newbe)  here behind
> > > NAT. The NAT setup is, I beleive, quite simple: the server is on
> > > 192.168.1.3, the router is at 192.168.1.1 and the public IP address is
> > > A.B.C.D. All calls/SIP requests originate from the public network. I
> > > do not want to relay RTP.
> > >
> > > >From what I understand, I need to use the nathelper module. I've got a
> > > script that *should* do something but SER reports "ERROR:
> > > send_rtpp_command: can't connect to RTP proxy".
> > >
> > > Does nathelper always require a RTP Proxy? Or, can this be done w/o nathelper?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> >
>