[Serusers] Anonymization/uac-module questions

[Elena Ramona Modroiu]

I had the impression that I got rid of that. I will double check.

Thanks for your attention,
Ramona

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:34:17AM +0100, Andreas Granig wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Elena Ramona Modroiu wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:53:49AM +0100, Andreas Granig wrote:
> >>And: you assume that SIP-URIs are always enclosed in <> when there's a 
> >>parameter appended. Where do you take this assumption from?
> >
> >
> >Where did I make this assumption? It is wrong, having no <> is correct and
> >follows the RFC. But in this case, the display name must not be present.
> 
> In modules/uac/from.c:153 of the main branch you (?) say:
> 
>   IMPORTANT: Since FROM hdr _must_ have all the time the tag parameter,
>   we assume that uri is also all the time quoted by <> (which is
>   required if the hdr has parameters).
> 
> The original From-header of the UAC doesn't contain a display name, but 
> the module complains about missing <> ("ERROR:uac:replace_from: broken 
> from hdr; no <>").
> 
> The From/To of the incoming BYE message is:
> 
> To: "Anonymous" 
> <sip:anonymous at my.domain.com>;tag=10f88cc2f5c2579;vsf=c2lwOjAxODkwNDQ0OEB0ZX
> N0dm9pcC5pbm9kZS5h
> 
> From: sip:01890444815 at my.domain.com;tag=899cf78f9882f5a
> 
> where sip:01890444815 at my.domain.com was the To-URI in the original INVITE.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andy