[Serusers] using sipsak to send a BYE

braincrew.com somebody at braincrew.com
Wed Mar 16 18:52:00 CET 2005


Sorry about using my friend email...

Steve
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pavel Siderov - Hostmates" <pi at hostmates.com>
To: "Java Rockx" <javarockx at gmail.com>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] using sipsak to send a BYE


> Attaching my ser.cfg (with little changes - the ips)
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Java Rockx" <javarockx at gmail.com>
> To: "braincrew.com" <somebody at braincrew.com>
> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] using sipsak to send a BYE
>
>
>> My problems last week regarding missing BYE messages at our PSTN GW
>> were due to a bug in my loose_route() logic. Basically I was doing
>> naughty things if loose_route() was TRUE, when I should have only been
>> using t_relay().
>>
>> In your case I'd say make sure you have the accounting flag set when
>> you receive a BYE or CANCEL message. You can set this flag immediately
>> after your "sanity checks" at the top of the main route block.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:07:16 +0200, braincrew.com
>> <somebody at braincrew.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> many thanks to your replies last week about user agent expiration (Sorry
>>> for
>>> not thanking you but
>>> just working ... 24 hours these days :(  ).
>>>
>>> I'm facing the similar issue with the byes on the side of ser. My B2BUA
>>> sends bye to ser but bye
>>> is not recorded in the database at about less than 10% of the calls. You
>>> have some idea what
>>> maybe the case ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance :),
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Java Rockx" <javarockx at gmail.com>
>>> To: "Iqbal" <iqbal at gigo.co.uk>
>>> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:12 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] using sipsak to send a BYE
>>>
>>> >I have. During my debugging with a 3rd party PSTN GW provider I
>>> > sometimes didn't send them a BYE message and they couldn't close their
>>> > billing record.
>>> >
>>> > So I stored this in a file and used sipsak to close their billing
>>> > record.
>>> >
>>> > BYE sip:5135551234 at 216.229.118.76:4060 SIP/2.0
>>> > Route: <sip:216.229.127.60:5060;lr>
>>> > From: sip:5135551234 at 64.152.60.6;user=phone
>>> > To: sip:9145550000 at 66.243.109.99:5060;user=phone
>>> > Contact: sip:9145550000 at 66.243.109.99:5060;user=phone
>>> > CSeq: 42759 BYE
>>> > Call-ID: 9787963-3319555348-76751 at 66.243.109.99
>>> > User-Agent: Grandstream BT100 1.0.5.11
>>> > Max-Forwards: 16
>>> > Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE
>>> > Content-Length: 0
>>> >
>>> > sipsak -f <filename> -s sip:<some IP address>
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Paul
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 03:07:05 GMT, Iqbal <iqbal at gigo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi
>>> >>
>>> >> Has anyone done this successfully to hangup a call.
>>> >>
>>> >> Iqbal
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Serusers mailing list
>>> >> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Serusers mailing list
>>> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list