[Serusers] Why Was This INVITE Not Loose_Route()ed ??

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Tue Mar 15 11:04:03 CET 2005


Hi Paul!

That something I also asked several times and no answer yet. In my 
experience, loose_route() is true if the request URI contains the "lr" 
paramter (message comes from a strict router). Nevertheless, the 
loose_route function will remove its own Route: header.

I solve the troubles by allowing t_relay for all messages with to-tag 
(in-dialog).

regards,
klaus


Java Rockx wrote:

> Hi All.
> 
> I just don't see why loose_route() returned FALSE for this INVITE
> message. Can anyone help?
> 
> This INVITE was sent from my SIP phone to my SER-0.9 proxy. The IPs
> look funny because our SER proxy sits behind a Cisco 3600 and the ALG
> stuff has rewritten the IPs (ie, the 10.3.0.221 address).
> 
> Regards,
> Paul
> 
> U 2005/03/14 16:01:19.932196 69.200.205.122:5060 -> 10.3.0.221:5060
> INVITE sip:9195531888 at 66.243.109.99:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.200.205.122:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2434592534.
> Route: <sip:10.3.0.221;ftag=10000000-0-1811969809;lr>.
> Route: <sip:216.229.127.60:5060;lr>.
> From: 3475626630 <sip:3475626630 at 66.243.109.99:5060;user=phone>;tag=550070175.
> To: <sip:9195531888 at 64.152.60.6;user=phone>;tag=10000000-0-1811969809.
> Call-ID: 348926-3319820023-453493 at 66.243.109.99.
> CSeq: 1 INVITE.
> Contact: <sip:3475626630 at 69.200.205.122:5060>.
> max-forwards: 70.
> Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE.
> Content-Type: application/sdp.
> Content-Length:   171.
> .
> v=0.
> o=- 9528 3044 IN IP4 0.0.0.0.
> s=-.
> c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0.
> t=0 0.
> m=audio 13456 RTP/AVP 18 101.
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.
> a=fmtp:101 0-15.
> a=sendonly.
> a=ptime:20.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list