[Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.

Java Rockx javarockx at gmail.com
Fri Mar 11 20:22:42 CET 2005


I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you showed in your first
email. So AFAIK, that is OK.

Regards,
Paul


On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
<rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> Paul,
>         I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem.
>         What about the tear down of the sessions?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> Ricardo.-
> 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> > Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09
> > Para: Ricardo Martinez
> > CC: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
> >
> >
> > Ricardo,
> >
> > I think the release notes on mediaproxy-1.2 say that some resource
> > leaks have been fixed.
> >
> > Perhaps you can try version 1.2
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
> > <rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> > > Hello list.
> > > I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
> > mediaproxy running.
> > > Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is increasing.
> >  It seems like
> > > for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources
> > used in RAM.  You
> > > can look this in the next lines :
> > >
> > >   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM
> > TIME CPU COMMAND
> > > 1952 root      15   0  284M 266M  1628 S     0.0      26.4
> > 19:22   0
> > > mediaproxy.py
> > >
> > > Can someone tell me if this is a bug of mediaproxy or maybe a
> > > missconfiguration in my ser.cfg?
> > >
> > > I want to ask a question regarding to tear down sessions
> > with mediaproxy
> > > also.  In my ser.cfg i have :
> > >      if (loose_route()) {
> > >                 if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")  {
> > >                         log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido
> > --> terminando la
> > > sesion de media\n");
> > >                         end_media_session();
> > >                         setflag(1);
> > >                 };
> > >                 t_relay();
> > >                 break;
> > >         };
> > >
> > > Is this ok?  I think in some cases (i'm still unable to
> > determine which
> > > ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session.  You
> > can see for example
> > > this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to
> > be active even
> > > before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination
> > IP's in the output
> > > of the session.py)
> > >
> > > Status       Duration  Codec    Type   Traffic
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------------
> > > ---
> > > hold (2430)    40'40"  G729     Audio  11.53k/29.58k/18.45k
> > > inactive        0'02"  Unknown  Audio  0/0/0
> > >
> > > Can someone tell me what's happening?
> > > I'm runnig :
> > > [root mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version
> > > mediaproxy.py 1.0
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ricardo M.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> >
>




More information about the sr-users mailing list