[Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.

Ricardo Martinez rmartinez at redvoiss.net
Fri Mar 11 21:15:38 CET 2005


Paul, 
	I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem.
	What about the tear down of the sessions?

Thanks!

Regards,
Ricardo.-

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09
> Para: Ricardo Martinez
> CC: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
> 
> 
> Ricardo,
> 
> I think the release notes on mediaproxy-1.2 say that some resource
> leaks have been fixed.
> 
> Perhaps you can try version 1.2
> 
> Regards,
> Paul
> 
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
> <rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> > Hello list.
> > I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the 
> mediaproxy running.
> > Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is increasing. 
>  It seems like
> > for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources 
> used in RAM.  You
> > can look this in the next lines :
> > 
> >   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   
> TIME CPU COMMAND
> > 1952 root      15   0  284M 266M  1628 S     0.0      26.4  
> 19:22   0
> > mediaproxy.py
> > 
> > Can someone tell me if this is a bug of mediaproxy or maybe a
> > missconfiguration in my ser.cfg?
> > 
> > I want to ask a question regarding to tear down sessions 
> with mediaproxy
> > also.  In my ser.cfg i have :
> >      if (loose_route()) {
> >                 if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")  {
> >                         log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido 
> --> terminando la
> > sesion de media\n");
> >                         end_media_session();
> >                         setflag(1);
> >                 };
> >                 t_relay();
> >                 break;
> >         };
> > 
> > Is this ok?  I think in some cases (i'm still unable to 
> determine which
> > ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session.  You 
> can see for example
> > this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to 
> be active even
> > before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination 
> IP's in the output
> > of the session.py)
> > 
> > Status       Duration  Codec    Type   Traffic
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> > ---
> > hold (2430)    40'40"  G729     Audio  11.53k/29.58k/18.45k
> > inactive        0'02"  Unknown  Audio  0/0/0
> > 
> > Can someone tell me what's happening?
> > I'm runnig :
> > [root mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version
> > mediaproxy.py 1.0
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Ricardo M.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list