[Serusers] Integrity of Forum

Iqbal iqbal at gigo.co.uk
Fri Mar 11 03:57:13 CET 2005


Hi

I dont think anyone has asked for payment, they are offering free
colocation space to someone who needs it at their own cost.

Iqbal

On 3/11/2005, "mr. barker" <cabalitomb at shaw.ca> wrote:

>This is getting a little out of control here.  When did this become a forum
>for advertising services for payment ?  I thought this was a discussion
>forum for help ?  It seems that people in here seem to think that when they
>have solution working for themselves it they should sell the services based
>on GNU. For that matter here is my offer to anyone that needs a solution
>
>Freeporn site with evey VOIP account monthly payment of only 69.69
>
>People that have a right to offer service for payment here should be those
>that acutually contribute programming for SER or its modules.
>
>Just my 2 cents.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
>Behalf Of voip
>Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 6:40 PM
>To: Barry Murphy; Alistair Cunningham
>Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Voip Solution advice
>
>
>Our company will allow you to colo a 1RU server at no cost if you do this in
>one of the following locations:
>
>Seattle
>NY
>
>Brandon Patterson
>LiveVoip LLC
>voip at livevoip.com
>
>
>* Using one main DB server and multiple nodes is a solution.
>
>
>> How does one implement the following:
>>
>> US Server - 202.7.6.33
>> NZ Auckland - 202.7.6.33
>> NZ Wellington - 202.7.6.33
>>
>> Each server also has a unique real world IP to communicate in the backend
>> for mysql etc, however the anycast range above is used to connect a person
>> to the closest peering server. I'm starting something similar to FWD but
>> with a NZ presence, there are a number of very excited users wishing to
>> signup, with an option of making international calls via a gateway
>> provider
>> in the future.
>>
>> The Auckland server will have the DB and all the others will connect
>> remotely to the DB via the unique IP address. The Auckland server will
>> have
>> an Asterisk installation running on 5070 to deal with voicemail and
>> peering
>> to other providers with my unique user/pass (Unless this can be done with
>> SER)
>>
>> If anyone is willing to help with this community project please advise, if
>> you could help with configs, that would be a GREAT help. If you're a
>> current
>> VOIP provider and have a solution that I could use to deploy this network,
>> it'd be much appreciated. I'm not doing this for money so I don't expect
>> to
>> be paying any money to set it up, I have the server resources and
>> bandwidth
>> and thought this would be a great way to put it to use. In return I can
>> advertise your PBX solutions to the NZ market as there are currently none
>> that I know of.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kindest Regards
>> Barry Murphy
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Alistair Cunningham" <acunningham at integrics.com>
>> To: "Barry Murphy" <barry at unix.co.nz>
>> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:09 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] problem with serwev confirmation...
>>
>>
>>> Barry,
>>>
>>> The fifo is used by programs such as serctl and the web interface to
>>> communicate with SER itself. It's not accessible from remote machines,
>>> which means that the web interface needs to run on the same machine as
>>> SER. If you have 2 SER machines you need to think carefully about how to
>>> do the web interface, as the web accesses both MySQL directly and SER
>>> through the FIFO.
>>>
>>> If you have to change the permissions each time, something is still
>>> wrong.
>>>
>>> Alistair Cunningham,
>>> Integrics Ltd,
>>> Telephony, Database, Unix consulting worldwide
>>> +44 (0)7870 699 479
>>> http://integrics.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> Barry Murphy wrote:
>>> > I've edited the code and got it all working, however still get slow
>>> > page
>>> > loads when trying to access ser_fifo (pages dont load, just blue bar
>> going
>>> > slowly till timeout). Another thing i'm thinking may be an issue is I
>> have 2
>>> > servers sharing the same DB, one remote server and then the local one,
>> how
>>> > are they going to share ser_fifo info; what the heck is ser_fifo used
>> for;
>>> > cant it use the DB?
>>> >
>>> > Everytime i start ser I have to change the permissions of ser_fifo :/
>>> >
>>> > Barry
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: "Alistair Cunningham" <acunningham at integrics.com>
>>> > To: "Barry Murphy" <barry at unix.co.nz>
>>> > Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>>> > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:04 AM
>>> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] problem with serwev confirmation...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>Barry,
>>> >>
>>> >>You shouldn't need to delete pending users by hand. If it's not being
>>> >>done automatically, something's wrong.
>>> >>
>>> >>Sure SER is running and is accessing the fifo? Try this command as
>>> >>root:
>>> >>
>>> >>fuser -v /tmp/ser_fifo
>>> >>
>>> >>It ought to list quite a few SER processes running.
>>> >>
>>> >>If you'd like commercial help getting this fixed, I can ssh into your
>>> >>server and take a look if you like. It wouldn't be very much. Drop me
>>> >>an
>>> >>email off list if you're interested.
>>> >>
>>> >>Alistair Cunningham,
>>> >>Integrics Ltd,
>>> >>Telephony, Database, Unix consulting worldwide
>>> >>+44 (0)7870 699 479
>>> >>http://integrics.com/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>Barry Murphy wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>Hi Alistair,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Same list different thread.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Yeah I did notice this mistake I made and corrected it, however since
>>> >
>>> > doing
>>> >
>>> >>>so, when I go to the confirmation page it says "opening page" with the
>>> >
>>> > vlue
>>> >
>>> >>>bar slowly moving across, never stops until timeout has exceeded. It's
>>> >
>>> > doing
>>> >
>>> >>>it's thing in the backround as it copys the user to subscribers but
>>> >
>>> > still
>>> >
>>> >>>not removing from pending, I may need to edit the code manually
>>> >>>however
>>> >>>didnt really want to do this. If I click the confirmation, see
>>> >>>"Opening
>>> >>>page" then click refresh  I get:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>error in SQL query, line: 43
>>> >>>We regret but your voipweb.fast.co.nz confirmation attempt failed.
>>> >>>Please contact voip at fast.co.nz for further assistance.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Removing pended users, well I can do this at midnight every sunday
>>> >
>>> > maybe.
>>> >
>>> >>>Barry
>>> >>>
>>> >>>----- Original Message -----
>>> >>>From: "Alistair Cunningham" <acunningham at integrics.com>
>>> >>>To: "Barry Murphy" <barry at unix.co.nz>
>>> >>>Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>>> >>>Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 8:57 AM
>>> >>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] problem with serwev confirmation...
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>Barry,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>(We seem to be meeting on more than one mailing list today!)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>From your output below, the fifo has owner 777, not permissions 777 -
>>> >>>>perhaps you were doing chown when you meant chmod?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>The fifo needs to be writeable by the user your web server is running
>>> >>>>as. On my lab system, it's:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>prw-rw-rw-  1 root root 0 Feb 21 10:53 /tmp/ser_fifo
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>To get this, run the following commands as root:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>chown root.root /tmp/ser_fifo
>>> >>>>chmod 0666 /tmp/ser_fifo
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>On production systems, I like to make a 'ser' group, put the ser and
>>> >>>>http server users in it, then chmod 0660 instead of 0666.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Leaving the user in the pending table is a bit ugly, but the system
>> will
>>> >>>>probably still work. You may care to fire up the mysql command line
>>> >>>>client, and do a 'delete from pending' when you know there's no-one
>>> >>>>in
>>> >>>>the queue.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Alistair Cunningham,
>>> >>>>Integrics Ltd,
>>> >>>>Telephony, Database, Unix consulting worldwide
>>> >>>>+44 (0)7870 699 479
>>> >>>>http://integrics.com/
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Barry Murphy wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>Ok i've brought this up in the past but no one answered:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>1./ User signs up
>>> >>>>>2./ User receives confirmation email
>>> >>>>>3./ User clicks on URL
>>> >>>>>4./ User receives:
>>> >>>>>Warning: fopen(/tmp/ser_fifo): failed to open stream: Permission
>> denied
>>> >>>
>>> >>>in
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>>/www/serweb/html/functions.php on line 206
>>> >>>>>sorry -- cannot open write fifo
>>> >>>>>We regret but your voipweb.fast.co.nz confirmation attempt failed.
>>> >>>>>Please contact voip at fast.co.nz for further assistance.
>>> >>>>>5./ In the backround user is actually added to subscription table
>>> >>>>>but
>>> >>>
>>> >>>left
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>>in pending table too, is this a problem?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>prw-rw----  1 777  wheel  0 Mar 10 16:51 /tmp/ser_fifo
>>> >>>>>I've tried chmod 777 this file many times, doesnt seem to help
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>Any idea's people? Is this ser_fifo file needed, what does it do?
>>> >>>>>How
>>> >
>>> > do
>>> >
>>> >>>I
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>>fix serweb?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>Barry
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>P.S. Latest stable Serweb via cvs
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>_______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>Serusers mailing list
>>> >>>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> >>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>




More information about the sr-users mailing list