[Serusers] Session-Expires Header

[Jiri Kuthan]

At 11:04 AM 3/9/2005, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>On Wednesday 09 March 2005 02:17, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>> At 11:04 PM 3/8/2005, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>> >Both UA's have to support the Session-Timer draft, otherwise the inserted
>> >Session-Expires Header will simply be ignored and you will never see any
>> >re-INVITE's. But if both UA's support the Session-Timer they should
>> > normaly agree on using automatically by looking at the Supported header.
>> > So in my opinion there is no extra value in adding a Session-Expires
>> > header to a request at a proxy.
>>
>> That's actually not correct. It is sufficient in one UA supports ST. It is
>> up to proxy server to handle the case correctly. We do that and there are
>> reasonable use cases.
>
>I did not wanted to write down this special case, but I feared that someone 
>will come up with it :-)

As a matter of fact, it is actually the regular case whcih we deployed in 
production networks. It was just a script thing. I'm currently having
difficulties accessing my home server to send out some examples but there
are such.

-jiri