[Serusers] Does loose_route ignore REGISTER messages with <Route> Headers?

[Klaus Darilion]

Hi!

I depends an what you want to achieve! REGISTERs with route headers are 
possible (sending the REGISTER via an outboundproxy using a pre-set route).

If the proxy acts as "normal" proxy (REGISTER for local users will be 
processed local; relaying not allowed) then you can catch the REIGSTER 
messages on top of ser.cfg and process them.

If the proxy acts an outbound proxy which relays the REGISTER you can 
use loose_route().

regards,
klaus



Java Rockx wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> Does anyone know if the loose_route() function returns FALSE for
> REGISTER messages that erroneously happen to contain Route headers?
> 
> In other words, do I have to do this:
> 
> route {
> 
>    # sanity checks
> 
>    if (method!="REGISTER") record_route();
> 
>    if (loose_route() && method!="REGISTER") {    <-------Is This Necessary???
>        # handle loose routing
>        break;
>    }
> 
>    # Normal processing
> }
> 
> Regards,
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
>