[Serusers] To modify the video and audio port together

[Maxim Sobolev]

I already have a version of nathelper/rtpproxy which correctly handles 
several media streams per single SIP session. I am planning to make it 
available for general public in about 1 month.

-Maxim

szj wrote:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
>> take a look at fix_nated_register() from nathelper. This function will 
>> use the received column.
>>
>    Thank you very much for you timely reply!
>    Yes, you are right, I am now browsing the fix_nated_*() functions.
>    What I want to to is to extend the extract_mediaport() to support
> the extraction of the audio and video port from SDP. Of course,
> we had to modify the alter_mediaport(), rtpproxy program and protocol
> between them.:(
>    I wonder who can give some advice on that!
>  
>     Thanks for all of you.
>   Best Regards
> 
>  Sun Zongjun
> 
>> regards,
>> klaus
>>
>>
>> szj wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  During the testing procedure, I found that when both sip UAs
>>> who are located behind the same NAT cloud want to establish
>>> voice or video connection, there is not neccesary to bridge
>>> them with rtpproxy. Only in situations where one of UA sits
>>> behind NAT or each UA sits behind different NAT clouds, that
>>> need a RTPProxy to bridge their media stream.
>>>  What I mean is SER can determine the use of RTPproxy or not
>>> through the registration of sip UA. In location table, there
>>> are recieved and contact fields. But ser don't fill the
>>> recieved field, I think it is very userful for NAT.
>>>
>>>    Glad to hear your instructions
>>>      Best Regards
>>>
>>> Sun Zongjun
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
>