[Serusers] multiple contact entries automatically....

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Jun 29 23:14:46 CEST 2005


Use ngrep and verify the REGISTER messages. If the NAT port changes can 
have mainly 2 reasons:
  - The NAT bindind expired and a new binding is created: Try to 
increase the NAT-ping or the expires value.
  - The SIP client changes its local SIP port: Throw them away and buy 
other phones :-(

regards,
klaus

Iqbal wrote:

> client = grandstream 102
> router = safecom
> stun = no, all far end done at ser
> 
> am gonna try to upgrade the firmware and see if that helps
> 
> Iqbal
> 
> On 6/29/2005, "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> 
> 
>>You have sent the 200 ok - not the REGISTER message. I still think that
>>there will be only 1 Contact in each REGISTER.
>>
>>Probably the client or/and the NAT is broken:
>>
>>Which client do you use?
>>Which NAT do you use?
>>Do you use STUN?
>>
>>klaus
>>
>>Iqbal wrote:
>>
>>>yup, thats what made me jump,
>>>
>>>well hers ngrep of when i get a 200OK
>>>
>>>SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>>>Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>111.222.333.444:51687;branch=z9hG4bK35d8fac5c0e457cb;rport=50395.
>>>From: <sip:040686 at sip.domain.com>;tag=107864afa36620af.
>>>To: <sip:040686 at sip.domain.com>;tag=bde2d0f39a3c31098b0c0a337d26256c.e50e.
>>>Call-ID: 55e8c488a0336b09 at 10.0.0.14.
>>>CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
>>>Contact:
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:51687>;expires=3600;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:48934>;expires=2998;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:34201>;expires=2680;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:63368>;expires=2352;received="sip:111.222.333.444:55174",
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:47768>;expires=2164;received="sip:111.222.333.444:37787",
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:33650>;expires=1360;received="sip:111.222.333.444:40862",
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:46754>;expires=121;received="sip:111.222.333.444:33159",
>>><sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:33159>;expires=26;received="sip:111.222.333.444:62574".
>>>
>>>Content-Length: 0.
>>>Warning: 392 123.456.76.87:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:  pid=32086
>>>req_src_ip=111.222.333.444 req_src_port=50395 in_uri=sip:sip.domain.com
>>>out_uri=sip:sip.domain.com via_cnt==1".
>>>
>>>which is what cause me to use serctl to look at location, and I got
>>>multiple entries.
>>>
>>>Havent a clue why this is/was
>>>
>>>iqbal
>>>
>>>Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Are you sure that they really get created at once? Is there more than
>>>>1 Contact in the REGISTER message?
>>>>
>>>>Please post an ngrep dump.
>>>>
>>>>klaus
>>>>
>>>>Iqbal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>the expire times do vary, the thing is they get all created on
>>>>>register at the same time, so I have 4 contacts for a new registers.
>>>>>
>>>>>Iqbal
>>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>MAybe the NAT binding disappears and a new port will bu used by the
>>>>>>NAT device. If you use nathelper, then you will save teh port of the
>>>>>>new binding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do the contacts vary in their expire time?
>>>>>> Yes: NAT problem
>>>>>> No: ? client problem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>klaus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Iqbal wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I have a really strange problem, when I am registering a IP phone,
>>>>>>>which is connected to a simple 4 port router, it i submitting
>>>>>>>multiple contacts into the db.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Even in the sip messages I can see multiple entries, the IP:port
>>>>>>>pairs only differ in the port numbers. Anyone else had this problem,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Iqbal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>>>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list