[Serusers] multiple contact entries automatically....
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Jun 29 17:32:00 CEST 2005
You have sent the 200 ok - not the REGISTER message. I still think that
there will be only 1 Contact in each REGISTER.
Probably the client or/and the NAT is broken:
Which client do you use?
Which NAT do you use?
Do you use STUN?
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
> yup, thats what made me jump,
>
> well hers ngrep of when i get a 200OK
>
> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 111.222.333.444:51687;branch=z9hG4bK35d8fac5c0e457cb;rport=50395.
> From: <sip:040686 at sip.domain.com>;tag=107864afa36620af.
> To: <sip:040686 at sip.domain.com>;tag=bde2d0f39a3c31098b0c0a337d26256c.e50e.
> Call-ID: 55e8c488a0336b09 at 10.0.0.14.
> CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
> Contact:
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:51687>;expires=3600;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:48934>;expires=2998;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:34201>;expires=2680;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:63368>;expires=2352;received="sip:111.222.333.444:55174",
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:47768>;expires=2164;received="sip:111.222.333.444:37787",
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:33650>;expires=1360;received="sip:111.222.333.444:40862",
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:46754>;expires=121;received="sip:111.222.333.444:33159",
> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:33159>;expires=26;received="sip:111.222.333.444:62574".
>
> Content-Length: 0.
> Warning: 392 123.456.76.87:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=32086
> req_src_ip=111.222.333.444 req_src_port=50395 in_uri=sip:sip.domain.com
> out_uri=sip:sip.domain.com via_cnt==1".
>
> which is what cause me to use serctl to look at location, and I got
> multiple entries.
>
> Havent a clue why this is/was
>
> iqbal
>
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>> Are you sure that they really get created at once? Is there more than
>> 1 Contact in the REGISTER message?
>>
>> Please post an ngrep dump.
>>
>> klaus
>>
>> Iqbal wrote:
>>
>>> the expire times do vary, the thing is they get all created on
>>> register at the same time, so I have 4 contacts for a new registers.
>>>
>>> Iqbal
>>>
>>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>
>>>> MAybe the NAT binding disappears and a new port will bu used by the
>>>> NAT device. If you use nathelper, then you will save teh port of the
>>>> new binding.
>>>>
>>>> Do the contacts vary in their expire time?
>>>> Yes: NAT problem
>>>> No: ? client problem?
>>>>
>>>> klaus
>>>>
>>>> Iqbal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a really strange problem, when I am registering a IP phone,
>>>>> which is connected to a simple 4 port router, it i submitting
>>>>> multiple contacts into the db.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even in the sip messages I can see multiple entries, the IP:port
>>>>> pairs only differ in the port numbers. Anyone else had this problem,
>>>>>
>>>>> Iqbal
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list