[Serusers] Bug with SER 9.0.2?

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Sun Jun 26 18:30:41 CEST 2005 

Probably the BYE is processed in the loose_route block.

regards,
klaus

Alberto Cruz wrote:
> I already tried this sending the BYE to the CANCEL&INVITE route block 
> but I still have the same behavior.
> 
> the "TEAR DOWN" block is ending the MEDIA SESSION and the CALL; isn't it?
> 
> Where should I apply the force_rport() command ?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alberto Cruz
> 
> Alberto Cruz wrote:
> 
>> So should I have to give the same treatment to method=="CANCEL" as 
>> method=="BYE"?
>> i.e.:
>>        if (client_nat_test("3")) {
>>                setflag(7);
>>                force_rport();
>>                fix_nated_contact();
>>        };
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Alberto Cruz
>>
>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alberto!
>>>
>>> The BYE message from the client has no 'rport' paramter in its Via: 
>>> header. Thus, ser sends the response to the IP:port in the via 
>>> header. As there is no port, ser assumes port 5060.
>>>
>>> You can manually add the rport paramter by using force_rport(). Then, 
>>> ser will add the port from which it received the message (61133) and 
>>> will use this prot for responses.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> klaus
>>>
>>> Alberto Cruz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anybody know if the following behavior is a bug?
>>>>
>>>> UA behind NAT -> SER with MEDIAPROXY -> GATEWAY
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:50:59.020747 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133*
>>>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0. 
>>>>
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
>>>> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.346082 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
>>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK7176.047de506.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9h
>>>> G4bK-bb14d3a0.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
>>>> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.349202 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:61133
>>>> *SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 172.31.253.127:5060;rport=61133;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-bb14d3a0. 
>>>>
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:51:20 GMT.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
>>>> CSeq: 101 INVITE.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.463073 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
>>>> ACK sip:018183324166 at 200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> CSeq: 101 ACK.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:51:06.466144 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
>>>> ACK sip:018183324166 at 200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-2cfda76b.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> CSeq: 101 ACK.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.932753 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
>>>> BYE sip:018183324166 at 200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.936356 200.94.75.6:5060 -> 200.94.75.1:5060
>>>> BYE sip:018183324166 at 200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Record-Route: <sip:200.94.75.6;ftag=7eee899c25104cbo0;lr=on>.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.943252 200.94.75.1:5060 -> 200.94.75.6:5060
>>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 200.94.75.6;branch=z9hG4bK4176.978b7dd1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955
>>>> e.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:46.944910 200.94.75.6:5060 -> *200.67.33.247:5060 
>>>> !!!! The UDP PORT was changed !!!!*
>>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>> 172.31.253.127:5060;received=200.67.33.247;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:53:13 GMT.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>>
>>>> *The UA retries the BYE again because it didn't receive the 200 OK 
>>>> with the right UDP PORT*
>>>>
>>>> U 2005/06/25 22:52:47.429710 *200.67.33.247:61133* -> 200.94.75.6:5060
>>>> BYE sip:018183324166 at 200.94.75.1:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.253.127:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fb84955e.
>>>> From: 8183651723 
>>>> <sip:8183651723 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=7eee899c25104cbo0.
>>>> To: <sip:018183324166 at sipsrv.conecta-te.com>;tag=2EC3E224-C59.
>>>> Call-ID: 994132b0-ecde4ec7 at 172.31.253.127.
>>>> CSeq: 102 BYE.
>>>>
>>>> I'm using
>>>> version: ser 0.9.2 (i386/linux)
>>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, 
>>>> DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 
>>>> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>>>> @(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei Exp $
>>>> main.c compiled on 10:21:27 Jun 11 2005 with gcc 3.3
>>>>
>>>> and MEDIAPROXY 1.3.1
>>>>
>>>> I have the ser.cfg for PSTN from ONSIP.org
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Alberto Cruz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
>

More information about the sr-users mailing list