[Serusers] Re: NAT problem
Bernd Froemel
bernd at nc6.net
Sat Jun 25 18:22:48 CEST 2005
So it is indeed also a Snom issue then (because I use the outbound proxy
feature but there is no Route: added, thus because of the private IP in
the URI I always get the "479 forward request to private ip address
denied" message if I send anything witch goes route[1]) ?
Bernd
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 18:14 +0200, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> On Saturday 25 June 2005 17:59, Bernd Froemel wrote:
> > Thanks a lot! Didn't thought it could be the Snom phones - finally a new
> > pointer! It got quite boring to watch ngrep and ser debug output while
> > don't seeing anything really wrong.
> >
> > But one thing is still a kind of riddle for me: are the Snoms not
> > working properly on the private ip and Route: header too, or do I have
> > something wrong in my cfg?
>
> If you expect a Route header in the initial INVITE then please read this:
> http://www.iptel.org/ser/sipintro.html
> Normaly you wont see a Route header in initial INVITE's (except the UA uses
> the Route header for the outbound proxy).
>
> Nils
>
> > > There is another problem with my INVITEs - for some reason they don't
> > >
> > > > get a 'Route:' header added; as it maybe is supposed to be.
> > > >
> > > > > #if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !
> > > > > search("^Route:"))
> > > > > #{
> > > > > # sl_send_reply("479", "forward request to private ip address
> > > > > denied"); # break;
> > > > > #};
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bernd
> >
> > On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 16:42 +0200, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> > > Hi Bernd,
> > >
> > > I guess you use snom UA's with more or less recent firmwares. These UA's
> > > do not accept incoming TCP connections any more. SER tries to open new
> > > TCP connections to the UA, which is rejected. Thus it ends up with an
> > > transport error.
> > > I'm not very familiar with it, but you could have more luck if you play
> > > around with the tcp_accept_aliases and other tcp_*_aliases parameters on
> > > your SER.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > On Saturday 25 June 2005 11:12, Bernd Froemel wrote:
> > > > I could fix some of my problems by using a proper conntrack kernel
> > > > module in my router - now the phones behind the same NAT remain
> > > > reachable; at least as long as there is no server restart or one of the
> > > > phones goes offline and online again without doing a unregister.
> > > >
> > > > Still a lot of
> > > >
> > > > er[27588]: ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: SO_ERROR (111) Connection
> > > >
> > > > > refused
> > > > > ser[27588]: ERROR: tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed
> > > > > ser[27588]: ERROR: tcp_send: connect failed
> > > > > ser[27588]: msg_send: ERROR: tcp_send failed
> > > > > ser[27588]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: sending request failed
> > > >
> > > > errors (especially on bye/cancel/acks which results in failure to
> > > > detect call terminations) while t_relay is issued.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone has an idea/pointer whats wrong here?
> > > >
> > > > There is another problem with my INVITEs - for some reason they don't
> > > > get a 'Route:' header added; as it maybe is supposed to be.
> > > >
> > > > > #if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !
> > > > > search("^Route:"))
> > > > > #{
> > > > > # sl_send_reply("479", "forward request to private ip address
> > > > > denied"); # break;
> > > > > #};
> > > >
> > > > Could anybody please post me a correct INVITE to CANCEL/BYE session
> > > > with two phones behind the same nat?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Bernd
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 13:15 +0200, Bernd Froemel wrote:
> > > > > Dear list,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have some wired problem between users behind the same NAT connected
> > > > > to a multihomed ser server (public&private IP). Ser is listening only
> > > > > on the public interface (ser.ip.address). The NATed clients have
> > > > > official.ip.address as their official IP address and 192.168.10.1 and
> > > > > 192.168.10.2 are their IP addresses behind NAT.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now after a register I get for the NATed clients the following
> > > > > entries into the location table:
> > > > >
> > > > > UA1:
> > > > > contact: sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2050;transport=tcp;line=1hzwxw3z
> > > > > received: sip:official.ip.address:2050;transport=TCP
> > > > > flags: 1
> > > > >
> > > > > UA2:
> > > > > contact: sip:test2 at 192.168.10.2:2050;transport=tcp;line=1hzwxw3z
> > > > > received: sip:official.ip.address:2050;transport=TCP
> > > > > flags: 1
> > > > >
> > > > > which looks quite good (why is the flag 1 and not 6?), but then on
> > > > > INVITE/SUBSCRIBE/ (everthing which issues a t_relay) my logs get full
> > > > > of:
> > > > >
> > > > > ser[27588]: ERROR: tcp_blocking_connect: SO_ERROR (111) Connection
> > > > > refused
> > > > > ser[27588]: ERROR: tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed
> > > > > ser[27588]: ERROR: tcp_send: connect failed
> > > > > ser[27588]: msg_send: ERROR: tcp_send failed
> > > > > ser[27588]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: sending request failed
> > > > >
> > > > > and the UA which issued the command receives a: 477 Unfortunately
> > > > > error on sending to next hop occurred message.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it has something to do with the lookup of the target UA - at
> > > > > least I always get the uri back which contains the private IP.
> > > > > (debugging output:
> > > > >
> > > > > befor lookup 80.123.216.181 - - sip:test at domain.com
> > > > > after lookup 80.123.216.181 - -
> > > > > sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2050;transport=tcp;line=lhzwxw3z
> > > > > )
> > > > >
> > > > > Also I guess that the commented part which is uncommented in the
> > > > > default cfg shouldn't prevent all NAT calls, but only calls to real
> > > > > private IPs.
> > > > >
> > > > > ( found in route[1] beginning, the nat route)
> > > > >
> > > > > #if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !
> > > > > search("^Route:"))
> > > > > #{
> > > > > # sl_send_reply("479", "forward request to private ip address
> > > > > denied"); # break;
> > > > > #};
> > > > > )
> > > > >
> > > > > But to due the lookup returning me a private IP uri this would result
> > > > > in a 479 error.
> > > > >
> > > > > My current test config is basically the one found in
> > > > > cvs/etc/ser.cfg.m4 with inserted values. I already tried other cfgs -
> > > > > even the example in modules/nathelper -- no success. Yes rtpproxy is
> > > > > running, I can even call the other UA and audio is working full
> > > > > duplex, but only at the very beginning. After a few minutes idleing
> > > > > or a server restart, without clearing the sql location table a call
> > > > > results always in the 477 error.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please help me - what am I missing here?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > Bernd
> > > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > Here my cfg and some SIP messages during REGISTER and INVITE
> > > > > (I have removed IPs and unnecessary parts, Asterisk gw is
> > > > > 192.168.xx.xx):
> > > > >
> > > > > #
> > > > > # ----------- global configuration parameters
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
> > > > > dns=yes # (cmd. line: -r)
> > > > > rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
> > > > > mhomed=1
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > # ------------------ module loading
> > > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters
> > > > > ---------------
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 15)
> > > > > modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)
> > > > > modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock")
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
> > > > > modparam("registrar", "use_domain", 1)
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1)
> > > > > modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
> > > > > #if BYE fails (telephone is dead, record-routing broken, etc.),
> > > > > generate #a report nevertheless -- otherwise we would have no STOP
> > > > > event; => 1 modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1)
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
> > > > > modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1)
> > > > > modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 3)
> > > > > modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 3)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
> > > > > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
> > > > > modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 1)
> > > > > modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 10)
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
> > > > > modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
> > > > > modparam("auth", "nonce_expire", 300)
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 20)
> > > > > modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 90)
> > > > > modparam("tm", "wt_timer", 20)
> > > > >
> > > > > #modparam("enum", "domain_suffix", "e164.arpa.")
> > > > >
> > > > > modparam("msilo", "registrar", "sip:registrar at xxxxxxxx")
> > > > >
> > > > > alias=domain1.com
> > > > > alias=domain2.com
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > flags:
> > > > > 1 ... ACCOUNT
> > > > > 3 ... MISSED CALLS
> > > > > 4 ... VOICEMAIL
> > > > > 6 ... NAT
> > > > > */
> > > > >
> > > > > # ------------------------- request routing logic
> > > > > -------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > # main routing logic
> > > > >
> > > > > route
> > > > > {
> > > > > # initial sanity checks -- messages with
> > > > > # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
> > > > > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > sl_send_reply("483","too many hops (loop?)");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > > if (msg:len >= 2048 )
> > > > > {
> > > > > sl_send_reply("513", "message too large");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (nat_uac_test("3"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (method=="REGISTER" || !search("^Record-Route:"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (method=="REGISTER")
> > > > > {
> > > > > fix_nated_register();
> > > > > } else
> > > > > {
> > > > > fix_nated_contact();
> > > > > };
> > > > > if (method=="INVITE")
> > > > > {
> > > > > log(1,"natted caller sent invite!\n");
> > > > > fix_nated_sdp("1");
> > > > > };
> > > > > force_rport();
> > > > > setflag(6);
> > > > > log(1, "natted caller detected\n");
> > > > > append_to_reply("P-NATed-Caller: Yes\r\n");
> > > > > } else
> > > > > {
> > > > > log(1, "something wrong here..\n");
> > > > > };
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #antispam
> > > > >
> > > > > if ( search("(From|F):.*@(domain1\.com)|(domain2\.com)|(192\.168\.xx
> > > > > \.xx)") )
> > > > > {
> > > > > if ( (method=="INVITE" || method=="SUBSCRIBE") && !(src_ip ==
> > > > > SER_IP
> > > > >
> > > > > || src_ip == 192.168.xx.xx) )
> > > > >
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (!(proxy_authorize("","subscriber")))
> > > > > {
> > > > > proxy_challenge("","0");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > > if (!check_from())
> > > > > {
> > > > > log("LOG: From Cheating attempt in INVITE!\n");
> > > > > sl_send_reply("403", "use From=id");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > > #consume_credentials();
> > > > > }; #non-REGISTER from other domain
> > > > > } else if ((method=="INVITE" || method=="SUBSCRIBE" ||
> > > > > method=="REGISTER") && !(uri==myself || uri=~"(@(192\.168\.xx
> > > > > \.xx)([;:].*)*)") )
> > > > > {
> > > > > sl_send_reply("403", "no relaying");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!(method=="REGISTER"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > record_route();
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > #if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")
> > > > > #{
> > > > > # unforce_rtp_proxy();
> > > > > #};
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
> > > > > # path determined by record-routing
> > > > > if (loose_route()) {
> > > > > if ((method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK" || method=="CANCEL") &&
> > > > > uri=~"(@(192\.168\.xx\.xx)([;:].*)*)")
> > > > > {
> > > > > route(4); # to asterisk
> > > > > }
> > > > > else
> > > > > {
> > > > > append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
> > > > > if (method=="BYE")
> > > > > {
> > > > > setflag(1);
> > > > > };
> > > > > log(1, "and directly to nat..\n");
> > > > > route(1); # to nat
> > > > > };
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!(uri==myself || uri=~"(@(192\.168\.xx\.xx)([;:].*)*)"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > # mark routing logic in request
> > > > > append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
> > > > > log(1, "outbound\n");
> > > > > route(1); # to nat
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > # ---->request is for our domains!<---- #
> > > > >
> > > > > if (method=="REGISTER")
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (!www_authorize("","subscriber"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > www_challenge("","0");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > > if (!check_to())
> > > > > {
> > > > > log("LOG: To Cheating attempt\n");
> > > > > sl_send_reply("403", "use From=id");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > > log(1, "(un)register successful\n");
> > > > > if (!save("location"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > sl_reply_error();
> > > > > };
> > > > > m_dump();
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (uri=~"sip:daemon@")
> > > > > {
> > > > > sl_send_reply("410", "daemon is gone");
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > lookup("aliases");
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!(uri==myself || uri=~"(@(192\.168\.xx\.xx)([;:].*)*)"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > append_hf("P-hint: ALIASED-OUTBOUND\r\n");
> > > > > route(1); #to nat
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (uri=~"^[a-zA-Z]+:\+[0-9]+@")
> > > > > {
> > > > > strip(1);
> > > > > prefix("00");
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!does_uri_exist())
> > > > > {
> > > > > if(uri=~"^[a-zA-Z]+:[0-9]+@")
> > > > > {
> > > > > route(4); #to pstn
> > > > > }
> > > > > else
> > > > > {
> > > > > sl_send_reply("604", "does not exist anywhere");
> > > > > };
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (is_user_in("Request-URI", "voicemail"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > setflag(4);
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > exec_msg("echo befor lookup $SIP_SRCIP - $SIP_ORURI - $SIP_RURI
> > > > >
> > > > > >> /tmp/ser.log");
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!lookup("location"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > log(1, "lookup failed\n");
> > > > > route(6);
> > > > > break;
> > > > > } else
> > > > > {
> > > > > log(1, "lookup successful\n");
> > > > > };
> > > > > exec_msg("echo after lookup $SIP_SRCIP - $SIP_ORURI - $SIP_RURI
> > > > >
> > > > > >> /tmp/ser.log");
> > > > >
> > > > > if (uri=~"(@(192\.168\.xx\.xx)([;:].*)*)")
> > > > > {
> > > > > log(1, "LOG: Gateway address in UsrLoc!\n");
> > > > > route(4); # to PSTN
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > if (method=="INVITE" && isflagset(4))
> > > > > {
> > > > > t_on_failure("1");
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > setflag(3);
> > > > >
> > > > > append_hf("P-hint: USRLOC\r\n");
> > > > > log(1, "nearly at end and going to nat..\n");
> > > > > exec_msg("echo $SIP_SRCIP - $SIP_ORURI - $SIP_RURI >>
> > > > > /tmp/ser.log"); route(1); # to nat
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > route[1]
> > > > > {
> > > > >
> > > > > #if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !
> > > > > search("^Route:"))
> > > > > #{
> > > > > # sl_send_reply("479", "forward request to private ip address
> > > > > denied"); # break;
> > > > > #};
> > > > >
> > > > > if (isflagset(6))
> > > > > {
> > > > > if(!is_present_hf("P-RTP-Proxy"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > force_rtp_proxy();
> > > > > append_hf("P-RTP-Proxy: Yes\r\n");
> > > > > log(1, "rtp proxied\n");
> > > > > };
> > > > > log(1,"natted calee\n");
> > > > > append_hf("P=NATed-Calee: Yes\r\n");
> > > > > };
> > > > > exec_msg("echo :: $SIP_SRCIP - $SIP_ORURI - $SIP_RURI
> > > > >
> > > > > >> /tmp/ser.log");
> > > > >
> > > > > log(1, "1\n");
> > > > > t_on_reply("1");
> > > > > log(1, "2\n");
> > > > > if (!t_relay()) {
> > > > > sl_reply_error();
> > > > > break;
> > > > > };
> > > > > log(1, "3\n");
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > route[4]
> > > > > {
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > onreply_route[1]
> > > > > {
> > > > > log(1, "taking onreply route\n");
> > > > > if(isflagset(6) && status=~"(183)|2[0-9][0-9]" &&
> > > > > !search("^Content-Length:\ +0"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > log(1,"onreply fixing nat\n");
> > > > > fix_nated_contact();
> > > > > force_rtp_proxy();
> > > > > } else if (nat_uac_test("1"))
> > > > > {
> > > > > log (1, "onreply fixing nat alternate\n");
> > > > > fix_nated_contact();
> > > > > };
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > route[4]
> > > > > {
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > route[6]
> > > > > {
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > REGISTER
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > T official.ip.address:2062 -> ser.ip.address:5060 [A]
> > > > > REGISTER sip:domain.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> > > > > 192.168.10.1:2062;br anch=z9hG4bK-wekq229vr3vn;rport..From: "Test"
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>;tag=3q2blh64wf..To: "Test"
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>..Call-ID:
> > > > > 3c26818830d4-ugwagbaz5vkz at snom360..CSeq: 22 REGISTER..Max-
> > > > > Forwards: 70..Contact:
> > > > > <sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2062;transport=tcp;line= lhzwxw3z>;q=1.0;
> > > > > +sip.instance="<urn:uuid:0c541696-09aa-4d0c-b8ca-fb9889cc61ad>"
> > > > > ;audio;mobility="fixed";duplex="full";description="snom360";actor="pr
> > > > >inci pal";
> > > > > events="dialog";methods="INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,REFER,OPTIONS,NOTIFY
> > > > > ,SUBSCRIBE,PRACK,MESSAGE,INFO"..User-Agent: snom360/3.60k..Supported:
> > > > > gruu.
> > > > > .Allow-Events: dialog..X-Real-IP: 192.168.0.191..WWW-Contact:
> > > > > <http://192.168.10.1:80>..WWW-Contact:
> > > > > <https://192.168.10.1:443>..Expires: 3600..Content-Length: 0
> > > > >
> > > > > T ser.ip.address:5060 -> official.ip.address:2062 [AP]
> > > > > SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> > > > > 192.168.10.1:2062;branch=z9hG4b
> > > > > K-wekq229vr3vn;rport=2062;received=official.ip.address..From:
> > > > > "Test" <sip:test at domain.com>;tag=3q2blh64wf..To: "Test" <sip:
> > > > > test at domain.com>;tag=5431d75005d8ed216f7c100a44746400.19d5..Call-ID
> > > > >
> > > > > : 3c26818830d4-ugwagbaz5vkz at snom360..CSeq: 22
> > > > >
> > > > > REGISTER..P-NATed-Caller: Yes
> > > > > ..WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="domain.com",
> > > > > nonce="42baac51779c17ebe
> > > > > ec20a5ee2f9492821bd723e"..Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.3
> > > > > (i386/linux))..
> > > > > Content-Length: 0..Warning: ser.ip.address:5060 "Noisy feedback
> > > > > tells: p
> > > > > id=27776 req_src_ip=official.ip.address req_src_port=2062
> > > > > in_uri=sip:domain.com out_uri=sip:domain.com via_cnt==1"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > T official.ip.address:2062 -> ser.ip.address:5060 [A]
> > > > > REGISTER sip:domain.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> > > > > 192.168.10.1:2062;br anch=z9hG4bK-6s4mq8dda681;rport..From: "Test"
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>;tag=3q2blh64wf..To: "Test"
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>..Call-ID:
> > > > > 3c26818830d4-ugwagbaz5vkz at snom360..CSeq: 23 REGISTER..Max-
> > > > > Forwards: 70..Contact:
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com:2062;transport=tcp;line= lhzwxw3z>;q=1.0;
> > > > > +sip.instance="<urn:uuid:0c541696-09aa-4d0c-b8ca-fb9889cc61
> > > > > ad>";audio;mobility="fixed";duplex="full";description="snom360";
> > > > > actor="principal";events="dialog";methods="INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,REFE
> > > > >R,OP TIONS,NOTIFY ,SUBSCRIBE,PRACK,MESSAGE,INFO"..User-Agent:
> > > > > snom360/3.60k..Supported: gruu.
> > > > > .Allow-Events: dialog..X-Real-IP: 192.168.10.1..WWW-Contact:
> > > > > <http://192.1
> > > > > 68.10.1:80>..WWW-Contact:
> > > > > <https://192.168.10.1:443>..Authorization:
> > > > > Digestusername="test",realm="domain.com",nonce="42baac51779c17ebeec20
> > > > >a
> > > > >
> > > > > 5ee2f9492821bd723e",uri="sip:domain.com",response="d2415424805014aac5
> > > > >04 b643ea489795",algorithm=md5..Expires: 3600..Content-Length: 0....
> > > > >
> > > > > T ser.ip.address:5060 -> official.ip.address:2062 [AP]
> > > > > SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> > > > > 192.168.10.1:2062;branch=z9hG4bK-6s4mq8dd
> > > > > a681;rport=2062;received=official.ip.address..From: "Test"
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>;tag=3q2blh64wf..To: "Test"
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>;tag=5431d75005d8ed216f7c100a44746400.d02e..Call
> > > > >-ID: 3c268188 30d4-ugwagbaz5vkz at snom360..CSeq: 23
> > > > > REGISTER..P-NATed-Caller: Yes..Contact:
> > > > >
> > > > > <sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2056;transport=tcp;line=lhzwxw3z>;q=1;expires=
> > > > > 2204;received="sip:official.ip.address:2056;transport=TCP",
> > > > > <sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2055;transport=tcp;line=lhzwxw3z>;q=1;expires=
> > > > >1551 ; received="sip:official.ip.address:2055;transport=TCP",
> > > > > <sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2062;transport=tcp;line=lhzwxw3z>;q=1;expires=
> > > > >3600 ; received="sip:official.ip.address:2062;transport=TCP"..Server:
> > > > > Sip EXpress router (0.9.3 (i386/linux))..Content-Length: 0..
> > > > > Warning: 392 ser.ip.address:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=27776
> > > > > req_ src_ip=official.ip.address req_src_port=2062
> > > > > in_uri=sip:domain.com out_uri=sip:domain.com via_cnt==1"
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > INVITE
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > T official.ip.address:33255 -> ser.ip.address:5060 [AP]
> > > > > INVITE sip:test at domain.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.10.2;
> > > > > branch=z9hG4bK3AA2CBD1;alias..CSeq: 2681 INVITE..To:
> > > > > <sip:test at domain .com>..Content-Type: application/sdp..From: "test2"
> > > > > <sip:test2 at domain.com
> > > > >
> > > > > >;tag=67807379..Call-ID: 1766830276 at 192.168.10.2..Subject: sip:test
> > > > >
> > > > > @domain.com..Content-Length: 230..User-Agent: kphone/4.1.1..Contac
> > > > > t: "test" <sip:test at 192.168.10.2;transport=tcp>....v=0..o=username
> > > > > 0 0 IN
> > > > > IP4 192.168.10.2..s=The Funky Flow..c=IN IP4 192.168.10.2..t=0
> > > > > 0..m=audio
> > > > > 32874 RTP/AVP 0 97 8 3..a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000..a=rtpmap:3
> > > > > GSM/8000..a=rtpma
> > > > > p:8 PCMA/8000..a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000..a=fmtp:97 mode=30..
> > > > > ##
> > > > > T ser.ip.address:5060 -> official.ip.address:33255 [AP]
> > > > > SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
> > > > > 192.168.10.2;b
> > > > >
> > > > > ranch=z9hG4bK3AA2CBD1;alias;rport=33255;received=official.ip.address.
> > > > >.CSe q: 2681 INVITE..To:
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>;tag=5431d75005d8ed216f7c100a4474
> > > > > 6400.5110..From: "test" <sip:test2 at domain.com>;tag=67807379..Call-I
> > > > > D: 1766830276 at 192.168.10.2..P-NATed-Caller: Yes..Proxy-Authenticate:
> > > > > Diges t realm="domain.com",
> > > > > nonce="42baaf784cd57486fa11fe10929ade10b8fc4 3ec"..Server: Sip
> > > > > EXpress router (0.9.3 (i386/linux))..Content-Length: 0..W
> > > > > arning: 392 ser.ip.address:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=27776
> > > > > req_src_ip=
> > > > > official.ip.address req_src_port=33255 in_uri=sip:test at domain.com
> > > > > out_ur
> > > > > i=sip:test at domain.com via_cnt==1"....
> > > > > ##
> > > > > T official.ip.address:33255 -> ser.ip.address:5060 [AP]
> > > > > ACK sip:test at domain.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.10.2;bra
> > > > > nch=z9hG4bK3AA2CBD1;alias..CSeq: 2681 ACK..To: <sip:test at domain.com
> > > > >
> > > > > >;tag=5431d75005d8ed216f7c100a44746400.5110..From: "test2"
> > > > > > <sip:test2@
> > > > >
> > > > > domain.com>;tag=67807379..Call-ID:
> > > > > 1766830276 at 192.168.10.2..Content-Leng
> > > > > th: 0..User-Agent: kphone/4.1.1..Contact: "test"
> > > > > <sip:test at 192.168.10.2;tr
> > > > > ansport=tcp>....
> > > > > ##
> > > > > T official.ip.address:33255 -> ser.ip.address:5060 [AP]
> > > > > INVITE sip:test at domain.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.10.2;
> > > > > branch=z9hG4bK36EBCF00;alias..CSeq: 2682 INVITE..To:
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com
> > > > >
> > > > > >..Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="test2 at domain.com", r
> > > > >
> > > > > ealm="domain.com", nonce="42baaf784cd57486fa11fe10929ade10b8fc43ec
> > > > > ", uri="sip:test at domain.com", cnonce="abcdefghi", nc=00000001, resp
> > > > > onse="2c088d59cb24c70c61d890245fe0f5ca", opaque="",
> > > > > algorithm="MD5"..Conten
> > > > > t-Type: application/sdp..From: "test2"
> > > > > <sip:test2 at domain.com>;tag=67 807379..Call-ID:
> > > > > 1766830276 at 192.168.10.2..Subject:
> > > > > sip:test2 at domain.com
> > > > > ..Content-Length: 230..User-Agent: kphone/4.1.1..Contact: "test"
> > > > > <sip: test at 192.168.10.2;transport=tcp>....v=0..o=username 0 0 IN IP4
> > > > > 192.168.0.1
> > > > > 03..s=The Funky Flow..c=IN IP4 192.168.10.2..t=0 0..m=audio 32874
> > > > > RTP/AVP
> > > > > 0 97 8 3..a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000..a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000..a=rtpmap:8
> > > > > PCMA/8000..
> > > > > a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000..a=fmtp:97 mode=30..
> > > > > ##
> > > > > T ser.ip.address:5060 -> official.ip.address:33255 [AP]
> > > > > SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us..Via:
> > > > > SIP/2.0/TCP 192.16
> > > > >
> > > > > 8.10.2;branch=z9hG4bK36EBCF00;alias;rport=33255;received=official.ip.
> > > > >addr ess..C Seq: 2682 INVITE..To: <sip:test at domain.com>..From: "test"
> > > > > <sip:test @domain.com>;tag=67807379..Call-ID:
> > > > > 1766830276 at 192.168.10.2..P-NA Ted-Caller: Yes..Server: Sip EXpress
> > > > > router (0.9.3
> > > > > (i386/linux))..Content-L
> > > > > ength: 0..Warning: 392 ser.ip.address:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:
> > > > > pid=27776
> > > > > req_src_ip=official.ip.address req_src_port=33255
> > > > > in_uri=sip:test at domain.com
> > > > > out_uri=sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2056;transport=tcp;line=lhzwxw3z vi
> > > > > a_cnt==1"....
> > > > > ##
> > > > > T ser.ip.address:5060 -> official.ip.address:33255 [AP]
> > > > > SIP/2.0 477 Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred
> > > > > (477/TM)..V
> > > > > ia: SIP/2.0/TCP
> > > > > 192.168.10.2;branch=z9hG4bK36EBCF00;alias;rport=33255;rece
> > > > > ived=official.ip.address..CSeq: 2682 INVITE..To:
> > > > > <sip:test at domain.com>;t
> > > > > ag=a0de3507a8823f96a254cc0a187acbf0-2573..From: "test2"
> > > > > <sip:test2 at domain.com
> > > > >
> > > > > >;tag=67807379..Call-ID: 1766830276 at 192.168.10.2..P-NATed-Caller:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes..Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.3
> > > > > (i386/linux))..Content-Length: 0..W
> > > > > arning: 392 ser.ip.address:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=27776
> > > > > req_src_ip=
> > > > > official.ip.address req_src_port=33255 in_uri=sip:test at domain.com
> > > > > out_ur
> > > > > i=sip:test at 192.168.10.1:2056;transport=tcp;line=lhzwxw3z
> > > > > via_cnt==1".. ..
> > > > > ##
> > > > > T official.ip.address:33255 -> ser.ip.address:5060 [AP]
> > > > > ACK sip:test at domain.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.10.2;bra
> > > > > nch=z9hG4bK36EBCF00;alias..CSeq: 2682 ACK..To: <sip:test at domain.com
> > > > >
> > > > > >;tag=a0de3507a8823f96a254cc0a187acbf0-2573..From: "test2"
> > > > >
> > > > > <sip:test2 at domain
> > > > > .com>;tag=67807379..Call-ID: 1766830276 at 192.168.10.2..Content-Leng
> > > > > th: 0..User-Agent: kphone/4.1.1..Contact: "test"
> > > > > <sip:test at 192.168.10.2;tr
> > > > > ansport=tcp>....
> > > > > #
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
More information about the sr-users
mailing list