[Serusers] failure_route question

[Jan Janak]

On 22-06-2005 08:53, Java Rockx wrote:
> Hi All.
> 
> I'm using t_check_status() to do call forwarding on 486 Busy responses. I 
> have an odd thing happening where SER receives the 486 Busy message (for 
> which SER properly sends an ACK response) and then the failure_route calls 
> append_branch() and t_relay() to try another destination.
> 
> After the new leg of the call is setup and then torn down, the original 486 
> Busy seems to be hung in the tm module, because it magically appears in 
> ngrep, which shows it being sent back to the caller as if the 
> append_branch() never took place.
> 
> Is there anything special that I should be doing to "swallow" the 486 Busy 
> response to prevent it from being sent to the caller UA?

  What was the reply received on the new leg ? Did you setup
  failure_route again for the new leg ?

      Jan.