[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] rel_0_9_0 release critical bugs/missingthings

[Samuel Osorio Calvo]

Undocummented code = non existing code (for almomst everyone except the developer and few guys reading the devel list, updating the working copy of the CVS, and checking the new code).....I know it is unpleasant, but two lines with an overview is not asking too much.....isn't it?

my contribution,

Samuel.


Unclassified.
>>> Jan Janak <jan at iptel.org> 06/21/05 11:58AM >>>
On 21-06-2005 09:20, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Greger V. Teigre writes:
> 
>  >     Let's try to make 0.9.x documentation as complete as possible now 
>  > leading up to the release!!
> 
> nathelper README doesn't describe all nat_uac_test modes.  tm module
> README seems to lack description of several exported functions.
> 
> these both are example of bad iptel.org policy.  no new features should
> be allowed to be added/changed in the code unless also the documentation
> is updated.

  Are you suggesting that commits should be rejected if they do not
  update documentation as well ? What is better, having undocumented
  code or having no code ?

    Jan.

_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
serdev at lists.iptel.org 
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev