[Serusers] OpenSER release

Greger V. Teigre greger at teigre.com
Thu Jun 16 07:36:47 CEST 2005


Jira is an issue tracking system and supports various categories. Please go 
ahead and have a look!  Register and play around.
g-)

info at beeplove.com wrote:
> Are you guys planning to have a feature request page as well?
>
> Mohammad
>
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Greger V. Teigre greger at teigre.com
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:03:21 +0200
> To: Salvatore.Giudice at FMR.COM, serdev at lists.iptel.org, serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] OpenSER release
>
>
> I completely agree with you. I have been told that there was an
> attempt at introducing a bug-tracking system earlier, but that it has
> been difficult. Anyhow, in setting up policies and procedures around
> the experimental directory, we have decided that usage of
> http://bugs.sip-router.org will be mandatory.  Hopefully recent,
> better integration between the bug tracking system and the CVS will
> make it more convenient to use also for other CVS modules (however, I
> don't have a say there).
> g-)
>
> Giudice, Salvatore wrote:
>> I am not an advocate for either ser or openser, but I would like to
>> comment.
>>
>> Is openser going to be equipped with a forum/ticket system where
>> people can document bugs, feature requests, etc (non-configuration
>> issues)?
>>
>> This is just my observation and you may not agree, but I believe this
>> project could be much better maintained if it used a more structured
>> ticketing style system to manage development issues instead of the
>> current mailing lists. In my experience, mailing lists like this
>> foster a terrible user experience where many development issues can
>> go on without response.
>>
>> Ideally, if there was a mailing list to address user issues and
>> ticketing system like the one Digium uses to manage Asterisk, I think
>> everyone would benefit by being better informed and ser would
>> ultimately be a better product for it. How many people out there feel
>> that their issues have fallen through the cracks in the past couple
>> years?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel at voice-system.ro]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 4:28 AM
>> To: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
>> Cc: SER developer mailing list; serusers; users at openser.org;
>> devel at openser.org
>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] OpenSER release
>>
>> On 06/14/05 23:21, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 14, 2005 at 22:48, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> <daniel at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>>> It is your opinion, but I repeat myself, that the SER code
>>>> maintained by us will go further -- I don't think that someone can
>>>> claim that we didn't do the job for our code (the only discrepancy
>>>> is some last-minute adds in xlog (to print avps) - will be
>>>> committed on unstable very soon
>>
>>>> with the new color patch). The cvs was created just to ease the
>>>> maintainance. The patches would be a nightmare.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe I've misunderstood you: is this only a parallel "stabilized"
>>> version + some features or is it a full fork (do you intend to fork
>>> unstable also)?
>>>
>>>
>> It is fork for the code that we changed (acc module, usrloc module
>> ...),
>>
>> in the future may be other that they do not find the path in SER. We
>> will maintain and upgrade our part of code from SER continuously.
>>
>>> I have no problem with another stable version, what worries me is
>>> fragmenting the development for unstable (which is the place where
>>> major changes are made).
>>>
>>>
>> I see no fragmenting there -- the situation is the same for SER as it
>> was before. For example, there is no fragment for acc module, it will
>> be
>>
>> maintained by who did it till now, adding what he considers necessary
>> there. But we came to meet a lot of requests of why the acc patch is
>> not
>>
>> included in the CVS (it was fully backward compatible and had new
>> features requested by many SER users) and we want to promote _more
>> open_
>>
>> approach to contributions to all parts of code. The acc patch was
>> sent on November 1, 2004. No real response (neither negative, nor
>> positive) from maintainer to the submission since then ... are you
>> aware of a good
>>
>> reason?!?! ... should we wait just about (or more) half an year for
>> each
>>
>> contribution?!? I will not do that anymore!!!
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ . 




More information about the sr-users mailing list