[Serusers] usrloc bug report

Java Rockx javarockx at gmail.com
Fri Jun 10 17:33:04 CEST 2005


Yep - this was already checked. I've not changed by ser.cfg file in weeks. 
I'm using nat_flag=6 in the registrar module.

I'm not using flag 6 for anything other than NAT, and if 
client_nat_test("7") is true then I call setflag(6).

Here is the exact section of my ser.cfg. I therefore feel that the last "cvs 
up" I did against rel_0_9_0 somehow caused the issue.

if (!search("^Contact:\ +\*") && client_nat_test("7")) {
setflag(6); # inform registrar module of NATed client
fix_nated_register();
force_rport();
};

Here is what it seems like. It seems that when a truly NATed client 
registers, the flag column is set properly, but subsequent non-NATed clients 
get flagged as being NATed because some variable isn't being reset properly 
either in the registrar or usrloc modules.

The reason I say this is because when I restart ser, with zero records in 
the location table, the first registration works fine. The flag is 1 for 
NATed clients and 0 or non-NATed clients, but over time all the flags 
eventually get set to 1 for all records. So it's almost like some variable 
is not being properly initialized.

Regards,
Paul
On 6/10/05, Jan Janak <jan at iptel.org> wrote:
> 
> On 10-06-2005 11:09, Java Rockx wrote:
> > Hi All.
> >
> > Here's a bit more info on the usrloc "flags" bug.
> >
> > This register message was flagged at NATed eventhough my "nat_flag" was 
> not
> > set.
> >
> > U 2005/06/10 11:01:27.853890 71.9.17.51:5060 <http://71.9.17.51:5060> <
> http://71.9.17.51:5060> ->
> > 10.3.0.221:5060 <http://10.3.0.221:5060> <http://10.3.0.221:5060>
> > REGISTER sip:sipdev.mycompany.net <http://sipdev.mycompany.net> <
> http://sipdev.mycompany.net> SIP/2.0.
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 71.9.17.51:5060 <http://71.9.17.51:5060> <
> http://71.9.17.51:5060>
> > ;branch=z9hG4bK1106535059.
> > From: Paul <sip:3215590000 at sipdev.company.net>;tag=3843647257.
> > To: Paul <sip:3215590000 at sipdev.company.net>.
> > Call-ID: 1846387046 at 71.9.17.51.
> > CSeq: 778 REGISTER.
> > Contact: <sip:3215590000 at 71.9.17.51:5060>.
> > Authorization: Digest username="3215590000",
> > realm="sipdev.mycompany.net <http://sipdev.mycompany.net><
> http://sipdev.mycompany.net>",
> > nonce="42a9ac7341e18f72830c3cd553fecfbd0c9fc6", uri="sip:
> > sipdev.company.net:5060 <http://sipdev.company.net:5060> <
> http://sipdev.company.net:5060>",
> > response="5443dedef7bfa7fb4a033af66a2392c", algorithm=MD5,
> > cnonce="3dc4445e42acd47873ca563a9942104a", qop=auth, nc=00000193.
> > max-forwards: 70.
> > expires: 900.
> > Content-Length: 0.
> >
> >
> > Another thing I see is that all usrloc records end up having the flag 
> column
> > set to 1 wheather the client is NATed or not. I'm setting the registrar
> > modules nat_flag using client_nat_test("7") when processing REGISTER
> > messages, however usrloc is not correctly setting the NAT_FLAG.
> 
> The default value of nat_flag parameter in registrar module is 4. Make
> sure you set that flag if client_nat_test returns true and that you
> are not using that flag for anything else.
> 
> Jan.
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050610/0856bd1f/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list