[Serusers] usrloc bug report

[Jan Janak]

OK, that means the flag was set when SER called save("location").

  Jan.

On 10-06-2005 11:19, Java Rockx wrote:
> The in memory usrloc record matches the MySQL location table. Here is the 
> output from "serctl ul show"
> 
> Regards,
> Paul
> 
> ...Record(0xb540bf08)...
> domain: 'location'
> aor : '3215590000'
> ~~~Contact(0xb540bf68)~~~
> domain : 'location'
> aor : '3215590000'
> Contact : 'sip:3215590000 at 71.9.17.51:5060'
> Expires : 736
> q : 0.1
> Call-ID : '1846387046 at 71.9.17.51'
> CSeq : 780
> User-Agent: 'Unknown'
> received : ''
> State : CS_SYNC
> Flags : 1
> next : (nil)
> prev : (nil)
> ~~~/Contact~~~~
> .../Record...
> 
> On 6/10/05, Jan Janak <jan at iptel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > What does serctl ul show ? Is there a difference between Flags field in
> > the output for that contact and contents of the database ?
> > 
> > Jan.
> > 
> > On 10-06-2005 10:45, Java Rockx wrote:
> > > Hi All.
> > >
> > > I've identified a bug in the usrloc module (I think). This can be
> > > reproduced.
> > >
> > > When a non-NATed client registers, usrloc will write an entry to the 
> > MySQL
> > > location table.
> > >
> > > If I manually change the "flags" column from 0 to 1 (which indicates a 
> > NATed
> > > client) and then restart SER, the next time the non-NATed client 
> > registers
> > > and usrloc refreshes the location table it does not update the flags 
> > column.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Paul
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > 
> >

> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers