[Serusers] usrloc bug report

[Java Rockx]

Hi All. 

Here's a bit more info on the usrloc "flags" bug.

This register message was flagged at NATed eventhough my "nat_flag" was not 
set.

U 2005/06/10 11:01:27.853890 71.9.17.51:5060 <http://71.9.17.51:5060> -> 
10.3.0.221:5060 <http://10.3.0.221:5060>
REGISTER sip:sipdev.mycompany.net <http://sipdev.mycompany.net> SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 71.9.17.51:5060 <http://71.9.17.51:5060>
;branch=z9hG4bK1106535059.
From: Paul <sip:3215590000 at sipdev.company.net>;tag=3843647257.
To: Paul <sip:3215590000 at sipdev.company.net>.
Call-ID: 1846387046 at 71.9.17.51.
CSeq: 778 REGISTER.
Contact: <sip:3215590000 at 71.9.17.51:5060>.
Authorization: Digest username="3215590000",
realm="sipdev.mycompany.net<http://sipdev.mycompany.net>",
nonce="42a9ac7341e18f72830c3cd553fecfbd0c9fc6", uri="sip:
sipdev.company.net:5060 <http://sipdev.company.net:5060>", 
response="5443dedef7bfa7fb4a033af66a2392c", algorithm=MD5, 
cnonce="3dc4445e42acd47873ca563a9942104a", qop=auth, nc=00000193.
max-forwards: 70.
expires: 900.
Content-Length: 0.


Another thing I see is that all usrloc records end up having the flag column 
set to 1 wheather the client is NATed or not. I'm setting the registrar 
modules nat_flag using client_nat_test("7") when processing REGISTER 
messages, however usrloc is not correctly setting the NAT_FLAG.

Regards,
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050610/067922bd/attachment.htm>