[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] ENUM issues - req. for discussion

[Adrian Georgescu]

On Jun 7, 2005, at 4:43 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

> Adrian Georgescu writes:
>
>> It does not crash but it causes SER to send stateless 500 back to the
>> client and does not stand the transaction which in term does not start
>> the accounting.
>
> there is not yet enough date why ser sent back 500.  perhaps the uri
> returned from enum was too long for ser to handle.  this would need to
> analyzed more carefully.
>
>> Check AT LEAST if the returned URI from NAPTR lookup has a valid 
>> scheme
>> that SER support  (e.g sip: sips:) h323 tel etc should be checked in
>> the enum lookup function.
>
> that kind of check cannot be done, because ser.cfg may decide to send
> 302 reply back to the ua instead of forwarding the request.  the us may
> very well support h322 ot tel uris.

SER does not allow you to take control and send 302 back, again 500 is 
sent back stateless to the client and the transaction fails.

Adrian