[Serusers] domain/realm routing

[raid at gmx.net]

hi

thanks for your answer

i use mediaproxy and nat works fine, but if i route the call with enum to
uac´s ip, mediaproxy dont proxy the call

if i provide 100 aliases for all users there is many work

i wouldn´t try that for more than 500 users, any user have the same 
extensions and there overlap with any aliases

the best solution would be to bind a user to his own realm and all incomig
calls with this realm forward to this user

isn´t there any other possibilty?


thanks

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Iqbal <iqbal at gigo.co.uk>
> An: Ritesh Jalan <ritesh.j at net4india.net>
> Kopie: raid at gmx.net, serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Betreff: Re: [Serusers] domain/realm routing
> Datum: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:14:30 +0100
> 
> Oh and for NAT, you can use nathelper and RTP proxy, or mediaproxy, or 
> as suggested asterisk, that latter is overkill I think unless you wish 
> to use other features of asterisk.
> 
> You can scale nicely with mediaproxy, also it depends upon what type of 
> NAT you are using/dealing with, again in the archives there is a huge 
> discussion on NAT.
> 
> iqbal
> 
> Ritesh Jalan wrote:
> 
> >Raid
> >
> >Its better to use some RTP proxy, or the best will be to use Ser +
> Asterisk
> >
> >
> >Thanks & Regards
> >Ritesh Jalan
> >Senior Engineer - Test & Audit
> >Net4India Ltd.
> >703 Bikaji Cama Bhawan
> >11 Bikaji Cama Place
> >New Delhi - 110029
> >Ph: +91-11-26160129 ext. 131
> >Cell : +91-9818616329
> >Web site: http://www.net4india.com
>
>============================================================================
> >==============================================
> >This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> you
> >are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
> you
> >must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or
> any
> >information herein. If you have received this message in error, please
> >advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.
> Thank
> >you for your cooperation.
>
>============================================================================
> >==============================================
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: <raid at gmx.net>
> >To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:04 PM
> >Subject: [Serusers] domain/realm routing
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>hi all
> >>
> >>example:
> >>
> >>uac1 with number 12345 and realm my1.mydomain.com
> >>uac2 with number 54321 and realm my2.mydomain.com
> >>and so on
> >>
> >>i use enum to write the called brunch to the realm
> >>this funktion is ok (if someone call 12345/123, enum rewrite the uri to
> >>123 at my1.mydomain.com) but ser says no user 123 at my1.mydomain.com
> >>
> >>if i change in enum zonefile my1.mydomain.com to the ip address of the
> uac
> >>ser send the call to the uac1, but there is no connect because the uac1
> is
> >>behind nat
> >>the next problem is if the user has a dynamic ip
> >>
> >>is there a way to bind an uac/user to an realm (all calls 12345/branches
> >>route to uac1 at my1.mydomain.com)
> >>
> >>i hope you understand my problem
> >>
> >>sorry for my bad english :(
> >>
> >>regards
> >>raid
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
> >>Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Serusers mailing list
> >>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >.
> >
> >  
> >
> 

-- 
Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl