[Serusers] STUN for NAT traversal...

Roger Lewau roger.lewau at serverhallen.com
Sat Jul 23 22:00:15 CEST 2005


I'm trying to use STUN for NAT traversal for all clients not using 1 to 1
NATing, and mediaproxy for the rare few who does.But it seems that all
traffic is proxied anyway, dont really understand why. I do call the
routeblock for mediaproxy before relaying the call, but since STUN is used
it should not detect that NAT is in place. Or am I missing some logic?
 
Any Idea on how to accomplish this?
 
Kind regards
Roger - Getting one step closer to a really god service everyday ;) 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050723/f0550bcd/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list