[Serusers] Missed BYEs

[Greger V. Teigre]

Jon,
AFAIK, there should be no reason in terms of code change etc that should 
make you miss BYEs for 0.9.3 that you haven't for 0.8.14.  I assume you mean 
accounting of BYEs?
    What is significant and can you track them going through SER? (using 
ngrep or xlog and log all BYEs)  If so, there is an issue. If you cannot see 
them in the log file (and you record route everything except REGISTER), 
there is something else going on.
g-)


Jon Mansey wrote:
> Hi
>
>> From my reporting I have seen a significant uptick in missed BYEs
>> since
> upgrading from 0.8.14 to 0.9.3, anyone have any tips where to start
> looking for why that might be? Im running a pretty stock onsip pstn
> with nat (rtpproxy) cfg file. I can post if necessary.
>
> Thx
>
> Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers