[Serusers] SER in production VOIP environment

[Budi Gautama]

Vonage is offering an unlimited USA & Canada, how are they able to do this?

On 6/22/05, Iqbal <iqbal at gigo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Depends on what you really want to do, and how you wish to scale,
> several setups which I have been invloved with use a combo of SER and
> asterisk, asterisk is great for alot of pbx functionality, but to be
> honest SER and asterisk can be awkward to get right all the time,
> passing mof message back and forth etc etc.
> 
> SER is a great proxy, and can handle all the registrations, althought it
> would be nice if there were a nice clustering solution for it, which
> worked with NAT, but i am sure that will come along soon enough, even
> with 3rd party apps like LVS. But even as a stand alone it can handle
> alot of queries, but as with nething fine tuning is time-based process
> and you cannot really build it to perfection on day one.
> 
> Asterisk can also handle gateway functionaility, and its a personal
> choice if you opt for oneof these or cisco box or something. carrier
> grade is not a easy option, and cannot be built overnight, but thats the
> great thing "build it and they will come" :-).
> 
> Iqbal
> 
> Jerlique Ban wrote:
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >I thought I would ask the list how people are using SER.  We plan to use it
> >in a production environment to be able to provide VOIP services to some
> >clients.
> >
> >How do companies such as vonage etc setup their systems, is it with SER
> >handling REGISTRATIONS and all other UA requests, and asterisk as a backend
> >which merely does media proxying?
> >
> >Look forward to your answers...
> >
> >JB
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>